Proceedings of ESCAPE 36ISSN: 2818-4734
Volume: 5 (2026)
Table of Contents
LAPSE:2026.0307
Published Article
LAPSE:2026.0307
A Process Modeling Approach for Water and Energy Optimization in Geologic Hydrogen Extraction
June 12, 2026
Abstract
Geologic hydrogen has emerged as a promising low-carbon energy vector, but its sustainable recovery requires effective stimulation and production strategies. This study presents an integrated process-modeling framework for evaluating hydrogen extraction from hydraulically stimulated reservoirs. The framework combines fracture propagation, damage evolution, Darcy-scale multiphase flow, permeability-aperture dynamics, and a dual-porosity dual-permeability (DPDP) representation to simulate hydrogen production in fractured source rock systems. In addition to production dynamics, the framework tracks operational water and energy inputs and incorporates a simplified reaction-extent formulation to represent hydrogen generation under data-limited conditions. The model was benchmarked against published shale gas production results to evaluate its ability to reproduce fracture-controlled production behavior and was subsequently applied to a representative multi-well hydrogen development scenario. Simulation results indicate that hydrogen production is strongly fracture-dominated, with fracture pathways accounting for more than 98% of total modeled output. Under the simulated conditions, the system produced approximately 1.13 million kg of hydrogen, with an estimated operational energy intensity of 3.4 MJ/kg H2 and water consumption of 0.02 m³/kg H2. These values represent model-based estimates within the defined operational system boundary and illustrate the potential performance indicators that the framework can generate. Per-well analysis reveals variability in water and energy efficiency across the multi-well system, highlighting the importance of fracture design and reservoir characterization. The simulations also indicate that matrix contributions to total recovery are limited under the assumed conditions, suggesting potential benefits from strategies that enhance matrix reactivity or transport processes. Overall, the framework provides an integrated approach for exploring hydrogen production dynamics together with associated resource requirements. As field and experimental data for geologic hydrogen systems become available, the framework can be further refined through improved parameterization, sensitivity analysis, and calibration to support future technical, environmental, and economic assessments.
Keywords
Energy, Extraction, Geologic hydrogen, Modelling and Simulations, Optimization, Water
Suggested Citation
Kaitano C, Majozi T. A Process Modeling Approach for Water and Energy Optimization in Geologic Hydrogen Extraction. Systems and Control Transactions 5:838-845 (2026) https://doi.org/10.69997/sct.143498
Author Affiliations
Kaitano C: University of the Witwatersrand, School of Chemical and Metallurgical Engineering, Braamfontein, Gauteng, South Africa [ORCID]
Majozi T: University of the Witwatersrand, School of Chemical and Metallurgical Engineering, Braamfontein, Gauteng, South Africa [ORCID]
[Login] to see author email addresses.
Journal Name
Systems and Control Transactions
Volume
5
First Page
838
Last Page
845
Year
2026
Publication Date
2026-06-12
Version Comments
Original Submission
Other Meta
PII: 0838-0845-20-SCT-5-2026, Publication Type: Journal Article
Record Map
Published Article

LAPSE:2026.0307
This Record
External Link

https://doi.org/10.69997/sct.143498
Publisher Version
Download
Files
Jun 12, 2026
Main Article
License
CC BY-SA 4.0
Meta
Record Statistics
Record Views
174
Version History
[v1] (Original Submission)
Jun 12, 2026
 
Verified by curator on
Jun 12, 2026
This Version Number
v1
Citations
Most Recent
This Version
URL Here
http://psecommunity.org/LAPSE:2026.0307
 
Record Owner
PSE Press
Links to Related Works
Directly Related to This Work
Publisher Version
References Cited
  1. Boafo J, Dotsey S, Spencer R. Energy transition diplomacy: the eu's pursuit of africa's critical minerals for renewable energy at whose expense?. Energy Research & Social Science 127:104213 (2025) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2025.104213
  2. Dawood F, Anda M, Shafiullah GM. Hydrogen production for energy: an overview. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy 45:3847-3869 (2020) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2019.12.059
  3. Osman AI, Mehta N, Elgarahy AM, Hefny M, Al-Hinai A, Al-Muhtaseb AH, Rooney DW. Correction to: hydrogen production, storage, utilisation and environmental impacts: a review. Environ Chem Lett 20:2213-2213 (2022) https://doi.org/10.1007/s10311-022-01432-x
  4. Hasiuk F, Conley DM. EXPLORING GEOLOGIC HYDROGEN : A NEW FRONTIER FOR AFFORDABLE, RELIABLE ENERGY SECURITY. 2025.
  5. Abdelghany MB, Shafiqurrahman A, Al-Durra A, Mohamed M, Hu J, Vaccaro A, Gao F, El Moursi MS. Hydrogen energy systems for decarbonizing smart cities and industrial applications: a review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 226:116370 (2026) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2025.116370
  6. Zgonnik V. The occurrence and geoscience of natural hydrogen: a comprehensive review. Earth-Science Reviews 203:103140 (2020) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.earscirev.2020.103140
  7. Maiga O, Deville E, Laval J, Prinzhofer A, Diallo AB. Trapping processes of large volumes of natural hydrogen in the subsurface: the emblematic case of the bourakebougou H2 field in mali. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy 50:640-647 (2024) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2023.10.131
  8. Prinzhofer A, Moretti I, Françolin J, Pacheco C, D'Agostino A, Werly J, Rupin F. Natural hydrogen continuous emission from sedimentary basins: the example of a brazilian h2-emitting structure. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy 44:5676-5685 (2019) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2019.01.119
  9. Osselin F, Soulaine C, Fauguerolles C, Gaucher EC, Scaillet B, Pichavant M. Orange hydrogen is the new green. Nat. Geosci. 15:765-769 (2022) https://doi.org/10.1038/s41561-022-01043-9
  10. Templeton AS, Ellison ET, Kelemen PB, Leong J, Boyd ES, Colman DR, Matter JM. Low-temperature hydrogen production and consumption in partially-hydrated peridotites in oman: implications for stimulated geological hydrogen production. Front. Geochem. 2: (2024) https://doi.org/10.3389/fgeoc.2024.1366268
  11. Egert R, Neupane G, Jin W. On the viability of stimulated hydrogen generation from iron-rich formations. Geoenergy Science and Engineering 256:214130 (2026) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoen.2025.214130
  12. Awosiji V, Graham S, Mukerji T. The concept of a blind hydrogen system. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy 158:150492 (2025) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2025.150492
  13. Angelina NM, Isah A, Samouei H, Okoroafor ER. Can stimulated geological hydrogen generation systems be circular?. SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition : (2025) https://doi.org/10.2118/227940-ms
  14. Mao S, Yu S, Xu J, Chen H, Zhao W, Blunt MJ, Kang Q, Gross M, Chen B, Van Wijk J, Yuan Q, Gao K, Kazi SR, Mehana M. Geologic hydrogen: a review of resource potential, subsurface dynamics, exploration, production, transportation, and research opportunities. Energy Environ. Sci. 18:9991-10035 (2025) https://doi.org/10.1039/d5ee02910d
  15. Jiang L, Ma Y, Wu J, Liu J, Liu T. Modeling production decline for fractured wells with non-uniform fracture properties: a semi-analytical approach based on double-segment fracture model. Processes 13:3627 (2025) https://doi.org/10.3390/pr13113627
  16. Zhao G, Yao Y, Wang L, Adenutsi CD, Feng D, Wu W. Optimization design of horizontal well fracture stage placement in shale gas reservoirs based on an efficient variable-fidelity surrogate model and intelligent algorithm. Energy Reports 8:3589-3599 (2022) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egyr.2022.02.228
(0.08 seconds)

[0.09 s]