Proceedings of ESCAPE 35ISSN: 2818-4734
Volume: 4 (2025)
Table of Contents
LAPSE:2025.0543
Published Article
LAPSE:2025.0543
An MILP model to identify optimal strategies to convert soybean straw into value-added products
Ivaldir J. Tamagno Junior, Bruno F. Santoro, Omar Guerra, Moisés Teles dos Santos
June 27, 2025
Abstract
Soybean is a highly valuable global commodity due to its versatility and numerous derivative products. During harvest, all non-seed materials become “straw”. Currently, this waste is primarily used for low-value purposes such as animal feed, landfilling, and incineration. To address this, the present work proposes a conceptual biorefinery aimed at converting soybean straw into higher-value products. The study began with data collection to identify potential conversion routes. Based on this information, a superstructure was developed, comprising seven conversion routes: four thermochemical routes (pyrolysis, combustion, hydrothermal gasification, and liquefaction), two biological routes (fermentation and anaerobic fermentation), and one chemical route (alkaline extraction). Each process was evaluated based on product yields, conversion times, and associated capital and operating costs. Using this data, an MILP (Mixed-Integer Linear Programming) optimization model was built in Pyomo using CPLEX as the solver. The variables in this problem were the amounts of biomass processed by each conversion process. The objective function was to maximize the Net Present Value (NPV). The optimization considered a maximum raw material supply of 232,500 metric tons per year. As a result, pyrolysis was identified as the most profitable route, yielding US$447 million, producing biochar, bio-oil and gas as products. It was observed that only if the price of the optimum product was 46% lower would the optimum conversion process change. In conclusion, soybean straw offers significant potential for value-added applications in a biorefinery context, with pyrolysis emerging as the most profitable route.
Keywords
Biomass, Biorefinery, Optimization, Pyomo, Soybean
Suggested Citation
Junior IJT, Santoro BF, Guerra O, Santos MTD. An MILP model to identify optimal strategies to convert soybean straw into value-added products. Systems and Control Transactions 4:2435-2440 (2025) https://doi.org/10.69997/sct.185559
Author Affiliations
Junior IJT: University of São Paulo, Department of Chemical Engineering, Escola Politécnica, São Paulo, SP, Brazil 
Santoro BF: OP2B - Optimization to Business Ltda., São Paulo, SP, Brazil
Guerra O: National Renewable Energy Laboratory, Golden, CO, USA
Santos MTD: University of São Paulo, Department of Chemical Engineering, Escola Politécnica, São Paulo, SP, Brazil 
Journal Name
Systems and Control Transactions
Volume
4
First Page
2435
Last Page
2440
Year
2025
Publication Date
2025-07-01
Version Comments
Original Submission
Other Meta
PII: 2435-2440-1656-SCT-4-2025, Publication Type: Journal Article
Record Map
Published Article

LAPSE:2025.0543
This Record
External Link

https://doi.org/10.69997/sct.185559
Article DOI
Data

LAPSE:2025.0034
An MILP model to identify optimal s...
Download
Files
Jun 27, 2025
Main Article
License
CC BY-SA 4.0
Meta
Record Statistics
Record Views
579
Version History
[v1] (Original Submission)
Jun 27, 2025
 
Verified by curator on
Jun 27, 2025
This Version Number
v1
Citations
Most Recent
This Version
URL Here
http://psecommunity.org/LAPSE:2025.0543
 
Record Owner
PSE Press
Links to Related Works
Directly Related to This Work
Article DOI
Supplementary Material
References Cited
  1. Conteratto, Caroline et al. Biorefinery: A comprehensive concept for the sociotechnical transition toward bioeconomy. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Rev, 2021 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2021.111527
  2. Maren, I. et al. Energy Exploitation and Environmental Impact In Nigeria: The Way Forward. Energy, 2013
  3. Bhat, Mudasir Ahmad et al. Lignocellulosic biomass in circular economy: A techno-transition in carbon neutrality towards sustainable energy production. Biomass Bioenergy, 2024 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2024.107349
  4. Bertran, Maria-Ona et al. Sustainable biorefinery process synthesis, design, and simulation: Systematic computer-aided methods and tools. In: AZ of Biorefinery. Elsevier, 2022 https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-819248-1.00023-3
  5. Hackl, Roman et al. Opportunities for process integrated biorefinery concepts in the chemical cluster in Stenungsund. Chalmers University of Technology, 2010
  6. Foreign Agricultural Service/USDA (2024) Global market analysis - world agricultural production December 2024 - Circular series WAP 12-24. World Agricultural Production | USDA Foreign Agricultural Service. Accessed 9 Jan 2024
  7. Martelli-tosi, Milena et al. Chemical treatment and characterization of soybean straw and soybean protein isolate/straw composite films. Carbohydrate polymers, 2017 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2016.10.013
  8. Gonzalez, Paula Gixina Ardila et al. Soybean straw as a feedstock for value-added chemicals and materials: recent trends and emerging prospects. BioEnergy Research, 2023
  9. Plantio Direto - Portal Embrapa. Disponível em: <https://www.embrapa.br/agencia-de-informacao tecnologica/cultivos/milho/producao/manejo-do-solo-e-adubacao/sistema-de-manejo-do-solo/plantio-direto>. Accessed 9 Jan. 2025
  10. ?Itapeva - SP - Área plantada, colhida, quantidade produzida, rendimento médio, valor da produção Portal Agrolink. Website <https://www.agrolink.com.br/regional/sp/itapeva/estatistica>. Accessed 9 Jan. 2025
  11. ?Turton, Richard et al. Analysis, synthesis and design of chemical processes. Pearson Education, 2008
  12. Biegler, L. T. et al. Systematic Methods of Chemical Process Design; Prentice-Hall, 1997
  13. Boateng, Akwasi A. et al. Sustainable production of bioenergy and biochar from the straw of high-biomass soybean lines via fast pyrolysis. Environ Prog Sustain Energy, 2010 https://doi.org/10.1002/ep.10446
  14. Hu, Shengjun et al. Production and characterization of biopolyols and polyurethane foams from crude glycerol based liquefaction of soybean straw. Bioresour Technol, 2012 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2011.09.125
  15. Li, Siqin et al. CO2 gasification of straw biomass and its correlation with the feedstock characteristics. Fuel, v. 297, p. 120780, 2021 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2021.120780
  16. Okolie, Jude A. et al. Hydrothermal gasification of soybean straw and flax straw for hydrogen-rich syngas production: Experimental and thermodynamic modeling. Energy Convers Manag, 2020 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2020.112545
  17. Vedovatto, Felipe et al. Production of biofuels from soybean straw and hull hydrolysates obtained by subcritical water hydrolysis. Bioresour Technol, 2021 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2021.124837
  18. Xiong, Jiading et al. Methane enhancement by the co-digestion of soybean straw and farm wastewater under different thermo-chemical pretreatments. Renewable Energy, 2020 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2019.05.102
  19. Han, Hongliang et al. Optimization of biohydrogen production from soybean straw using anaerobic mixed bacteria. Int J Hydrogen Energy, 2012 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2012.03.073
  20. Reddy, Narendra et al. Natural cellulose fibers from soybean straw. Bioresource Technology, 2009 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2008.09.063
  21. Domingos, Meire Ellen G. R. et al. Techno-economic and environmental analysis of methanol and dimethyl ether production from syngas in a kraft pulp process. Comput Chem Eng, 2022
  22. Soka, Ongama. Process Optimisation and techno-economic assessment of the slow pyrolysis of corn-stover. Diss. Cape Peninsula University of Technology, 2020
  23. Meyer, Pimphan A. et al. Techno-economic analysis of corn stover fungal fermentation to ethanol. Applied energy, 2013 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2013.04.085
  24. Tran, My Ha et al. Sustainable biopolyol production via solvothermal liquefaction silvergrass saccharification residue: Experimental, economic, and environmental approach. Science of the Total Environment, 2022 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.157668
  25. Storm, Benjamin et al. Techno-economic and sustainability assessment: Circular cellulose to textile fiber production. 2023
  26. Rajendran, Karthik et al. Techno-economic and life cycle assessments of anaerobic digestion-A review. Biocatal Agric Biotechnol, 2019 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bcab.2019.101207
  27. Li, Ya-Chieh et al. Techno-economic evaluation of biohydrogen production from wastewater and agricultural waste. Int J Hydrogen Energy, 2012 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2012.05.043
  28. Huang, Ye et al. Comparative techno-economic analysis of biomass fuelled combined heat and power for commercial buildings. Applied energy, 2013 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2013.03.078
  29. Eason, John P.; Cremaschi, Selen. A multi-objective superstructure optimization approach to biofeedstocks-to-biofuels systems design. Biomass and Bioenergy, 2014 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2014.02.010