Proceedings of ESCAPE 35ISSN: 2818-4734
Volume: 4 (2025)
Table of Contents
LAPSE:2025.0527
Published Article
LAPSE:2025.0527
Machine learning-enhanced Sensitivity Analysis for Complex Pharmaceutical Systems
Daniele Pessina, Roberto Andrea Abbiati, Davide Manca, Maria M. Papathanasiou
June 27, 2025
Abstract
Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) models are used to predict drug transport in the body and to assess treatment efficacy and optimal dosage. The kinetic parameters embedded in the models, which define transport across body compartments or drug efficacy, can be linked to patient-specific characteristics; understanding the parameter space-model output relationship is critical towards linking patient population heterogeneity to the therapeutic outcome variability. Global Sensitivity Analysis (GSA) is a well-established tool used to examine parameter-to-parameter interactions, shedding light on underlying interactions towards enhanced system understanding. Despite its potential and usefulness, GSA performance is dependent to the model complexity; large-scale and nonlinear PK/PD models, which often have large sets of parameters, can render GSA challenging to perform, requiring excessive computational effort. Proposed approaches to reduce GSA complexity, such as segmentation in parameter subsets or the introduction of surrogate metamodels, become less effective as the number of kinetic parameters grows. In this work, we investigate the potential of Machine Learning (ML) to reduce the complexity of PK/PD models by exploring how the level of hybridisation can impact the GSA performance and, critically, whether the use of surrogates affects the resulting model sensitivity to parametric uncertainty. We show that ML-based surrogates can reliably identify parameter interactions and sensitivities while requiring only a limited number of simulations of the reference mechanistic model. Further, surrogates models effectively reduce the computational expenditure of GSA of multi-dimensional nonlinear PK/PD models. The accelerated execution of GSA enables performing patient cohort-specific analysis, with potential applications for optimal study design and for precision medicine.
Keywords
Global Sensitivity Analysis, Pharmacokinetic modelling, Surrogate modelling
Suggested Citation
Pessina D, Abbiati RA, Manca D, Papathanasiou MM. Machine learning-enhanced Sensitivity Analysis for Complex Pharmaceutical Systems. Systems and Control Transactions 4:2334-2340 (2025) https://doi.org/10.69997/sct.133428
Author Affiliations
Pessina D: Sargent Centre for Process Systems Engineering, Imperial College London, SW7 2AZ, United Kingdom; Department of Chemical Engineering, Imperial College London, SW7 2AZ, United Kingdom
Abbiati RA: Roche Pharma Research and Early Development, Predictive Modeling, F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd. Grenzacherstrasse 124, 4070 Basel, Switzerland
Manca D: PSE-Lab, Dipartimento di Chimica, Materiali e Ingegneria Chimica “Giulio Natta” Politecnico di Milano, Piazza Leonardo da Vinci 32, 20133 Milano, Italy
Papathanasiou MM: Sargent Centre for Process Systems Engineering, Imperial College London, SW7 2AZ, United Kingdom; Department of Chemical Engineering, Imperial College London, SW7 2AZ, United Kingdom
Journal Name
Systems and Control Transactions
Volume
4
First Page
2334
Last Page
2340
Year
2025
Publication Date
2025-07-01
Version Comments
Original Submission
Other Meta
PII: 2334-2340-1313-SCT-4-2025, Publication Type: Journal Article
Record Map
Published Article

LAPSE:2025.0527
This Record
External Link

https://doi.org/10.69997/sct.133428
Article DOI
Download
Files
Jun 27, 2025
Main Article
License
CC BY-SA 4.0
Meta
Record Statistics
Record Views
810
Version History
[v1] (Original Submission)
Jun 27, 2025
 
Verified by curator on
Jun 27, 2025
This Version Number
v1
Citations
Most Recent
This Version
URL Here
http://psecommunity.org/LAPSE:2025.0527
 
Record Owner
PSE Press
Links to Related Works
Directly Related to This Work
Article DOI
References Cited
  1. R. A. Abbiati, G. Lamberti, M. Grassi, F. Trotta, and D. Manca, "Definition and validation of a patient-individualized physiologically-based pharmacokinetic model," Computers & Chemical Engineering, vol. 84, pp. 394-408, Jan. 2016, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compchemeng.2015.09.018
  2. FDA, "Division of Pharmacometrics," FDA. Accessed: Jan. 06, 2025. [Online]. Available: https://www.fda.gov/about-fda/cder-offices-and-divisions/division-pharmacometrics
  3. R. A. Abbiati and C. Pichardo, "An introduction to Quantitative Systems Pharmacology for Chemical Engineers," Phys. Sci. Rev., 2024, https://doi.org/10.1515/psr-2024-0066
  4. R. F. W. De Cock, C. Piana, E. H. J. Krekels, M. Danhof, K. Allegaert, and C. A. J. Knibbe, "The role of population PK-PD modelling in paediatric clinical research," Eur J Clin Pharmacol, vol. 67, no. 1, pp. 5-16, May 2011, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00228-009-0782-9
  5. E. Asín-Prieto, A. Rodríguez-Gascón, and A. Isla, "Applications of the pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) analysis of antimicrobial agents," Journal of Infection and Chemotherapy, vol. 21, no. 5, pp. 319-329, May 2015, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jiac.2015.02.001
  6. R. Sheikholeslami, S. Razavi, H. V. Gupta, W. Becker, and A. Haghnegahdar, "Global sensitivity analysis for high-dimensional problems: How to objectively group factors and measure robustness and convergence while reducing computational cost," Environmental Modelling & Software, vol. 111, pp. 282-299, Jan. 2019, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2018.09.002
  7. S. Shan and G. G. Wang, "Metamodeling for High Dimensional Simulation-Based Design Problems," Journal of Mechanical Design, vol. 132, no. 051009, May 2010, https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4001597
  8. P. Daoutidis et al., "Machine learning in process systems engineering: Challenges and opportunities," Computers & Chemical Engineering, vol. 181, p. 108523, Feb. 2024, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compchemeng.2023.108523
  9. J. D. Scheff, R. R. Almon, D. C. DuBois, W. J. Jusko, and I. P. Androulakis, "Assessment of Pharmacologic Area Under the Curve When Baselines are Variable," Pharm Res, vol. 28, no. 5, pp. 1081-1089, May 2011, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11095-010-0363-8
  10. A. Saltelli, Ed., Global sensitivity analysis: the primer. Chichester, England ; Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley, 2008
  11. F. Sarrazin, F. Pianosi, and T. Wagener, "Global Sensitivity Analysis of environmental models: Convergence and validation," Environmental Modelling & Software, vol. 79, pp. 135-152, May 2016, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2016.02.005