LAPSE:2025.0505
Published Article

LAPSE:2025.0505
Teaching Computational Tools in Chemical Engineering Curriculum in Preparation for the Capstone Design Project
June 27, 2025
Abstract
UCL Chemical Engineering ensures graduates are digitally literate by integrating computational tools like gPROMS, Aspen Plus, and GAMS into the undergraduate curriculum. Students in the first year of undergraduate program use GAMS to solve simple simulation and optimization problems and gPROMS for solving ordinary differential equations (ODEs) in reactor design problems. In the second year, students start using Aspen Plus to simulate more complex chemical process units, interpret and discuss results obtained and justify any differences observed between experimental data and computational results. They use GAMS to simulate and optimize a process flowsheet with considerations of the implications of proper initialization procedures and strategies for obtaining optimal parameters and gPROMS for advanced reactor and separator problems. The computational knowledge acquired in the first two years prepares students for the third-year capstone design project where they use the various tools in designing and simulating their processes during the preliminary, conceptual and detail designs. The computational resources available to students and the additional supports provided by educators help the students succeed on the design project in the third year. This work outlines strategies for delivering the computational tools required for modules in the first two years of the undergraduate program and the application of the knowledge in the third-year design project. It demonstrates how complex process systems engineering (PSE) problems are taught, student support and resources available, and feedback for continuous improvement. It presents some challenges faced due to the use of generative AI tools and how this can be addressed.
UCL Chemical Engineering ensures graduates are digitally literate by integrating computational tools like gPROMS, Aspen Plus, and GAMS into the undergraduate curriculum. Students in the first year of undergraduate program use GAMS to solve simple simulation and optimization problems and gPROMS for solving ordinary differential equations (ODEs) in reactor design problems. In the second year, students start using Aspen Plus to simulate more complex chemical process units, interpret and discuss results obtained and justify any differences observed between experimental data and computational results. They use GAMS to simulate and optimize a process flowsheet with considerations of the implications of proper initialization procedures and strategies for obtaining optimal parameters and gPROMS for advanced reactor and separator problems. The computational knowledge acquired in the first two years prepares students for the third-year capstone design project where they use the various tools in designing and simulating their processes during the preliminary, conceptual and detail designs. The computational resources available to students and the additional supports provided by educators help the students succeed on the design project in the third year. This work outlines strategies for delivering the computational tools required for modules in the first two years of the undergraduate program and the application of the knowledge in the third-year design project. It demonstrates how complex process systems engineering (PSE) problems are taught, student support and resources available, and feedback for continuous improvement. It presents some challenges faced due to the use of generative AI tools and how this can be addressed.
Record ID
Keywords
Subject
Suggested Citation
Kamel D, Tsatse A, Badmos S. Teaching Computational Tools in Chemical Engineering Curriculum in Preparation for the Capstone Design Project. Systems and Control Transactions 4:2197-2202 (2025) https://doi.org/10.69997/sct.126494
Author Affiliations
Kamel D: Department of Chemical Engineering, University College London, Torrington Place, WC1E 7JE London, UK
Tsatse A: Department of Chemical Engineering, University College London, Torrington Place, WC1E 7JE London, UK
Badmos S: Department of Chemical Engineering, University College London, Torrington Place, WC1E 7JE London, UK
Tsatse A: Department of Chemical Engineering, University College London, Torrington Place, WC1E 7JE London, UK
Badmos S: Department of Chemical Engineering, University College London, Torrington Place, WC1E 7JE London, UK
Journal Name
Systems and Control Transactions
Volume
4
First Page
2197
Last Page
2202
Year
2025
Publication Date
2025-07-01
Version Comments
Original Submission
Other Meta
PII: 2197-2202-1262-SCT-4-2025, Publication Type: Journal Article
Record Map
Published Article

LAPSE:2025.0505
This Record
External Link

https://doi.org/10.69997/sct.126494
Article DOI
Download
Meta
Record Statistics
Record Views
610
Version History
[v1] (Original Submission)
Jun 27, 2025
Verified by curator on
Jun 27, 2025
This Version Number
v1
Citations
Most Recent
This Version
URL Here
http://psecommunity.org/LAPSE:2025.0505
Record Owner
PSE Press
Links to Related Works
References Cited
- Tsatse AK, Sorensen E. Teaching strategies for the effective use of computational tools within the Chemical Engineering curriculum. Computer Aided Chemical Engineering 52:3501-3506 (2023) https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-443-15274-0.50559-X
- Chalchooghi MM, Sorensen E. Supporting the use of PSE computational tools across a chemical engineering program. Computer Aided Chemical Engineering. 44: 1651-1656 (2018) https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-444-64241-7.50270-6
- Gani R, Chen X, Eden MR, Mansouri SS, Martin M, Mujtaba IM, et al. Challenges and Opportunities for Process Systems Engineering in a Changed World. Computer Aided Chemical Engineering. 49:7-20 (2022) https://doi.org 10.1016/B978-0-323-85159-6.50002-6 https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-323-85159-6.50002-6
- Aspentech (2024). Aspen Plus USA, Aspen Technology.Inc.,https://www.aspentech.com/en/products/engineering/aspen-plus [Accessed 27/10/2024]
- GAMS (2024). https://www.gams.com [Accessed 27/10/2024]
- Siemens Process Systems Engineering (2022). gPROMS, https://www.psenterprise.com/products/gproms/process, 1997-2022
- CHEMCAD (2024) https://chemstations.com/chemcad. [Accessed 30/01/2025]
- Mathworks (2024). https://uk.mathworks.com/products/matlab.html [Accessed 27/10/2024]
- Python (2024) https://www.python.org/ . [Accessed 30/01/2025]
- Udugama IA, Atkins M, Bayer C, Carson J, Dikicioglu D, Gernaey K V. Digital tools in chemical engineering education: The needs and the desires. Education for Chemical Engineers.44:63-70 (2023) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ece.2023.05.002
- Pistikopoulos EN, Barbosa-Povoa A, Lee JH, Misener R, Mitsos A, Reklaitis G V., et al. Process systems engineering - The generation next? Computers and Chemical Engineering. 147(2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compchemeng.2021.107252
- Corelli A. Direct vs. Anonymous Feedback: Teacher Behavior in Higher Education, with Focus on Technology Advances. Procedia Soc Behav Sci. 195:52-61 (2015) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.06.329
- Nayak-Luke R, Odunsi A, Badmos S, Pollock, M. Teaching, assessing and operational sustainability in UCL's chemical engineering capstone design project. In Proceedings of the 8th International Symposium for Engineering Education Article 2126 University of Strathclyde (2022)
- Cowan J. Teaching for quality learning at university - By John Biggs & Catherine Tang. British Journal of Educational Technology.43:93-100(2012) https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2012.01317_3.x
- Bovill A. Student-sta? partnerships in learning and teaching: An overview of current practice and discourse' Journal of geography in higher education. 43: 385-398 (2019) https://doi.org/10.1080/03098265.2019.1660628

