LAPSE:2025.0495
Published Article

LAPSE:2025.0495
Impact of energy sources on Global Warming Potential of hydrogen production: Case study of Uruguay
June 27, 2025
Abstract
In 2022, Uruguay launched its green hydrogen roadmap, due to its renewable energy potential, water availability, and favorable logistics to position itself as an exporter of green hydrogen and derivatives. The energy source for water electrolysis is a key factor in both the final cost and the environmental impact of hydrogen production. In this context, this study evaluates the environmental impact of hydrogen production via water electrolysis, powered by 150 MW of new power sources (solar, wind, and hybrid farms) in Uruguay, all connected to the national grid. A life cycle assessment (LCA) was conducted using OpenLCA software and the Ecoinvent database, with 1 kg of hydrogen as the functional unit and the system boundaries included power generation and the electrolysis system. The analysis focused on global warming potential (GWP), considering different scenarios for the grid energy mix and the inclusion or exclusion of surplus energy as carbon credits. The wind plant is the option that generates the highest energy output and surplus while requiring the least energy purchase from the Uruguayan grid, due to its higher capacity factor. Regarding GWP, it is also the alternative with the lowest environmental impact, with annual average emissions ranging from 0.84 to 1.02 kg CO2/kg H2 not considering carbon credits (CC) and between 0.2 and -1.87 kg CO2/kg H2 when CC are considered. These values represent emissions based on grid connection during the years with the highest proportion of renewable and fossil sources, respectively.
In 2022, Uruguay launched its green hydrogen roadmap, due to its renewable energy potential, water availability, and favorable logistics to position itself as an exporter of green hydrogen and derivatives. The energy source for water electrolysis is a key factor in both the final cost and the environmental impact of hydrogen production. In this context, this study evaluates the environmental impact of hydrogen production via water electrolysis, powered by 150 MW of new power sources (solar, wind, and hybrid farms) in Uruguay, all connected to the national grid. A life cycle assessment (LCA) was conducted using OpenLCA software and the Ecoinvent database, with 1 kg of hydrogen as the functional unit and the system boundaries included power generation and the electrolysis system. The analysis focused on global warming potential (GWP), considering different scenarios for the grid energy mix and the inclusion or exclusion of surplus energy as carbon credits. The wind plant is the option that generates the highest energy output and surplus while requiring the least energy purchase from the Uruguayan grid, due to its higher capacity factor. Regarding GWP, it is also the alternative with the lowest environmental impact, with annual average emissions ranging from 0.84 to 1.02 kg CO2/kg H2 not considering carbon credits (CC) and between 0.2 and -1.87 kg CO2/kg H2 when CC are considered. These values represent emissions based on grid connection during the years with the highest proportion of renewable and fossil sources, respectively.
Record ID
Subject
Suggested Citation
Olave V, Pineda J, Larnaudie V, Corengia M. Impact of energy sources on Global Warming Potential of hydrogen production: Case study of Uruguay. Systems and Control Transactions 4:2133-2139 (2025) https://doi.org/10.69997/sct.166537
Author Affiliations
Olave V: Universidad Tecnológica del Uruguay, Unidad Tecnológica de Energías Renovables, Durazno, Durazno, Uruguay
Pineda J: Universidad Tecnológica del Uruguay, Unidad Tecnológica de Energías Renovables, Durazno, Durazno, Uruguay
Larnaudie V: Universidad de la Republica, Depto. De Bioingeniería, Instituto de Ingeniería Química, Montevideo, Montevideo, Uruguay
Corengia M: Universidad de la Republica, Instituto de Ingeniería Química, Facultad de Ingeniería, Montevideo, Montevideo, Uruguay
Pineda J: Universidad Tecnológica del Uruguay, Unidad Tecnológica de Energías Renovables, Durazno, Durazno, Uruguay
Larnaudie V: Universidad de la Republica, Depto. De Bioingeniería, Instituto de Ingeniería Química, Montevideo, Montevideo, Uruguay
Corengia M: Universidad de la Republica, Instituto de Ingeniería Química, Facultad de Ingeniería, Montevideo, Montevideo, Uruguay
Journal Name
Systems and Control Transactions
Volume
4
First Page
2133
Last Page
2139
Year
2025
Publication Date
2025-07-01
Version Comments
Original Submission
Other Meta
PII: 2133-2139-1677-SCT-4-2025, Publication Type: Journal Article
Record Map
Published Article

LAPSE:2025.0495
This Record
External Link

https://doi.org/10.69997/sct.166537
Article DOI
Download
Meta
Record Statistics
Record Views
562
Version History
[v1] (Original Submission)
Jun 27, 2025
Verified by curator on
Jun 27, 2025
This Version Number
v1
Citations
Most Recent
This Version
URL Here
http://psecommunity.org/LAPSE:2025.0495
Record Owner
PSE Press
Links to Related Works
References Cited
- Ministerio de Industria, Energía y Minería. Green Hydrogen Roadmap in Uruguay. https://www.gub.uy/ministerio-industria-energia-mineria/comunicacion/noticias/green-hydrogen-roadmap-in-uruguay
- Maniscalco MP, Longo S, Cellura M, Miccichè G, Ferraro M. Critical review of life cycle assessment of hydrogen production pathways. Environments 11:108 (2024) https://doi.org/10.3390/environments11060108
- [Cho HH, Strezov V, Evans TJ. A review on global warming potential, challenges and opportunities of renewable hydrogen production technologies. Sustainable Materials and Technologies 35:00567 (2023) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.susmat.2023.e00567
- Iyer RK, Prosser JH, Kelly JC, James BD, Elgowainy A. Life-cycle analysis of hydrogen production from water electrolyzers. Int J Hydrogen Energy 81:1467-1478 (2024) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2024.06.355
- Kanz O, Bittkau K, Ding K, Rau U, Reinders A. Review and harmonization of the life-cycle global warming impact of PV-powered hydrogen production by electrolysis. Front Electron 2: 711103 (2021) https://doi.org/10.3389/felec.2021.711103
- Inter-American Development Bank. Guide for the Implementation of a Hydrogen Certification System in Latin America and the Caribbean. https://publications.iadb.org/en/publications/english/viewer/Guide-for-the-Implementation-of-a-Hydrogen-Certification-System-in-Latin-America-and-the-Caribbean.pdf
- Liu W, Wan Y, Xiong Y, Gao P. Green hydrogen standard in China: Standard and evaluation of low-carbon hydrogen, clean hydrogen, and renewable hydrogen. Int J Hydrogen Energy 47:24584-24591 (2022) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2021.10.193
- CERTIFHY. https://www.certifhy.eu/
- Valente A, Iribarren D, Dufour J. Harmonised life-cycle global warming impact of renewable hydrogen. J Clean Prod 149:762-772 (2017) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.02.163
- Acar C, Dincer I. Comparative assessment of hydrogen production methods from renewable and non-renewable sources. Int J Hydrogen Energy 39:1-12 (2014) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2013.10.060
- Weschenfelder F, Pires GN, Araújo AC, de Castro O, Ribeiro CM, Villa AA, Araújo AM. A review on the complementarity between grid-connected solar and wind power systems. J Clean Prod 257:120617 (2020) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.120617
- Ministerio de Industria, Energía y Minería. Balance Energético Nacional. https://ben.miem.gub.uy
- ADME. https://adme.com.uy/index.php
- Heide, D., Von Bremen, L., Greiner, M., Hoffmann, C., Speckmann, M., & Bofinger, S. Seasonal optimal mix of wind and solar power in a future, highly renewable Europe. Renewable Energy, 35(11): 2483-2489 (2010) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2010.03.012
- Bareiß K, de la Rua C, Möckl M, Hamacher T. Life cycle assessment of hydrogen from proton exchange membrane water electrolysis in future energy systems. Appl Energy 237:862-872 (2019) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2019.01.001
- Koj JC, Zapp P, Wieland C, Görner K, Kuckshinrichs W. Life cycle environmental impacts and costs of water electrolysis technologies for green hydrogen production in the future. Energy Sustain Soc 14:64 (2024) https://doi.org/10.1186/s13705-024-00497-6

