LAPSE:2025.0491
Published Article

LAPSE:2025.0491
Life cycle assessment of a post-combustion CO2 capture unit through chemical absorption
June 27, 2025
Abstract
This study evaluates the environmental impact of carbon capture technology in the context of reducing industrial CO2 emissions within Eco-Industrial Parks (EIP). The primary focus is on the post-combustion absorption process, which uses solvents like monoethanolamine (MOA) to capture CO2 before it is released into the atmosphere. The captured CO2 is either stored or utilized to prevent further contribution to climate change. The study employs a Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) methodology to compare the environmental impacts of two scenarios: one with CO2 capture and the other with the direct release of CO2 into the atmosphere. The LCA considers inputs, outputs, energy requirements, and materials needed for the CO2 absorption process. The functional unit of the assessment is 1000 tons of CO2, to standardize comparisons between both scenarios. Results show that the CO2 absorption process significantly reduces the impact on climate change, capturing over 80% of the CO2 from the stream. In terms of climate change, the absorption process has a much lower environmental impact than releasing CO2 into the atmosphere. However, other ecological impacts, such as resource use and ecotoxicity, are higher in the absorption process due to the materials required and the solvents used. In conclusion, while the CO2 absorption process offers clear climate benefits, it introduces additional environmental challenges. Future studies should explore alternative carbon capture technologies and extend the scope to include CO2 storage impacts and a broader range of LCA tools for more detailed assessments.
This study evaluates the environmental impact of carbon capture technology in the context of reducing industrial CO2 emissions within Eco-Industrial Parks (EIP). The primary focus is on the post-combustion absorption process, which uses solvents like monoethanolamine (MOA) to capture CO2 before it is released into the atmosphere. The captured CO2 is either stored or utilized to prevent further contribution to climate change. The study employs a Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) methodology to compare the environmental impacts of two scenarios: one with CO2 capture and the other with the direct release of CO2 into the atmosphere. The LCA considers inputs, outputs, energy requirements, and materials needed for the CO2 absorption process. The functional unit of the assessment is 1000 tons of CO2, to standardize comparisons between both scenarios. Results show that the CO2 absorption process significantly reduces the impact on climate change, capturing over 80% of the CO2 from the stream. In terms of climate change, the absorption process has a much lower environmental impact than releasing CO2 into the atmosphere. However, other ecological impacts, such as resource use and ecotoxicity, are higher in the absorption process due to the materials required and the solvents used. In conclusion, while the CO2 absorption process offers clear climate benefits, it introduces additional environmental challenges. Future studies should explore alternative carbon capture technologies and extend the scope to include CO2 storage impacts and a broader range of LCA tools for more detailed assessments.
Record ID
Keywords
Subject
Suggested Citation
Gabrion A, Thomas S, Boix M, Negny S. Life cycle assessment of a post-combustion CO2 capture unit through chemical absorption. Systems and Control Transactions 4:2108-2113 (2025) https://doi.org/10.69997/sct.196032
Author Affiliations
Gabrion A: Laboratoire de Génie Chimique, UMR 5503, Toulouse INP/ CNRS/ UPS, 4 Allée Emile Monso, 31432 Toulouse Cedex 4, France
Thomas S: Laboratoire de Génie Chimique, UMR 5503, Toulouse INP/ CNRS/ UPS, 4 Allée Emile Monso, 31432 Toulouse Cedex 4, France
Boix M: Laboratoire de Génie Chimique, UMR 5503, Toulouse INP/ CNRS/ UPS, 4 Allée Emile Monso, 31432 Toulouse Cedex 4, France
Negny S: Laboratoire de Génie Chimique, UMR 5503, Toulouse INP/ CNRS/ UPS, 4 Allée Emile Monso, 31432 Toulouse Cedex 4, France
Thomas S: Laboratoire de Génie Chimique, UMR 5503, Toulouse INP/ CNRS/ UPS, 4 Allée Emile Monso, 31432 Toulouse Cedex 4, France
Boix M: Laboratoire de Génie Chimique, UMR 5503, Toulouse INP/ CNRS/ UPS, 4 Allée Emile Monso, 31432 Toulouse Cedex 4, France
Negny S: Laboratoire de Génie Chimique, UMR 5503, Toulouse INP/ CNRS/ UPS, 4 Allée Emile Monso, 31432 Toulouse Cedex 4, France
Journal Name
Systems and Control Transactions
Volume
4
First Page
2108
Last Page
2113
Year
2025
Publication Date
2025-07-01
Version Comments
Original Submission
Other Meta
PII: 2108-2113-1641-SCT-4-2025, Publication Type: Journal Article
Record Map
Published Article

LAPSE:2025.0491
This Record
External Link

https://doi.org/10.69997/sct.196032
Article DOI
Download
Meta
Record Statistics
Record Views
283
Version History
[v1] (Original Submission)
Jun 27, 2025
Verified by curator on
Jun 27, 2025
This Version Number
v1
Citations
Most Recent
This Version
URL Here
http://psecommunity.org/LAPSE:2025.0491
Record Owner
PSE Press
Links to Related Works
References Cited
- Haut Conseil pour le Climat, Rapport annuel (2024)
- Wang, P. et al. (2024) 'Advances in life cycle assessment of chemical absorption-based carbon capture technologies', Separation and Purification Technology, 346, p. 127252. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seppur.2024.127252
- Putta, K.R. et al. (2016) 'CO2 absorption into loaded aqueous MEA solutions: Kinetics assessment using penetration theory', International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control, 53, pp. 338-353. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijggc.2016.08.009
- Cradle-to-Gate: What is it & How does it work in LCA?' (no date) Ecochain. Available at: https://ecochain.com/blog/cradle-to-gate-in-lca/
- Boix, M. et al., (2024) Decarbonization strategies by industrial ecology, Computers Aided Process Engineering, Volume 53, 3445-3450, ISSN 1570-7946, https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-443-28824-1.50575-5
- Boix, M. et al., (2023). How to design cooperative sustainable industrial systems? Computers Aided Process Engineering, Volume 50, 959-964, ISSN 1570-7946, https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-323-88506-5.50148-0
- Kim et al., (2010). S., Kim, Yoon, S.-G., Chae, S. H. & Park, S., 2010, Economic and environmental optimization of a multi-site utility network for an industrial complex. J. Env. Manag. 91, 690-705 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2009.09.033

