Proceedings of ESCAPE 35ISSN: 2818-4734
Volume: 4 (2025)
Table of Contents
LAPSE:2025.0489
Published Article
LAPSE:2025.0489
Optimization of hydrogen system deployment via environmental and economic life cycle assessment
Alessandro Poles, Catherine Azzaro-Pantel, Henri Schneider, Renato Luise
June 27, 2025
Abstract
Hydrogen is increasingly recognized as a key player in future energy systems. However, its production technologies—Steam Methane Reforming (SMR) and electrolysis—present trade-offs. SMR, the dominant method, is cost-effective but has a significant carbon footprint, emitting substantial greenhouse gases (GHGs). In contrast, electrolysis, powered by renewable energy sources, offers a cleaner alternative, albeit at a higher cost. While current hydrogen system optimizations primarily focus on cost reduction and GHG mitigation, they often neglect broader environmental impacts. This paper addresses the challenge of modeling a hydrogen supply chain (HSC) that achieves strong environmental performance at a relatively affordable cost. To this end, a supply chain design optimization is coupled with Life Cycle Assessment (LCA). The novelty of this work lies in the integration of multiple LCA indicators in the supply chain design optimization, rather than focusing solely on costs and Global Warming Potential. The model employs a multi-period (2025–2050) mixed-integer linear programming (MILP) formulation, implemented in the General Algebraic Modeling System (GAMS) environment, using CPLEX as the solver. The Bourgogne-Franche-Comté region is used as a case study to illustrate the framework. Initial optimization results highlight how varying the focus on different parameters can lead to distinct solutions and provide insights into the interactions between indicators. Future research will aim to reduce the dimensionality in multi-objective optimization to improve efficiency while maintaining environmental sustainability in the development of hydrogen networks.
Keywords
Green Energy, Hydrogen Supply Chain, Life Cycle Assessment, Multi-criteria assessment
Suggested Citation
Poles A, Azzaro-Pantel C, Schneider H, Luise R. Optimization of hydrogen system deployment via environmental and economic life cycle assessment. Systems and Control Transactions 4:2094-2100 (2025) https://doi.org/10.69997/sct.121439
Author Affiliations
Poles A: Laboratoire de Génie Chimique, Université Toulouse, CNRS, INPT, Toulouse, France
Azzaro-Pantel C: Laboratoire de Génie Chimique, Université Toulouse, CNRS, INPT, Toulouse, France
Schneider H: Laboratoire Plasma et Conversion d’Énergie, INPT, Toulouse, France
Luise R: European Institute for Energy Research, Emmy-Noether Straße 11, Karlsruhe, Germany
Journal Name
Systems and Control Transactions
Volume
4
First Page
2094
Last Page
2100
Year
2025
Publication Date
2025-07-01
Version Comments
Original Submission
Other Meta
PII: 2094-2100-1596-SCT-4-2025, Publication Type: Journal Article
Record Map
Published Article

LAPSE:2025.0489
This Record
External Link

https://doi.org/10.69997/sct.121439
Article DOI
Download
Files
Jun 27, 2025
Main Article
License
CC BY-SA 4.0
Meta
Record Statistics
Record Views
554
Version History
[v1] (Original Submission)
Jun 27, 2025
 
Verified by curator on
Jun 27, 2025
This Version Number
v1
Citations
Most Recent
This Version
URL Here
http://psecommunity.org/LAPSE:2025.0489
 
Record Owner
PSE Press
Links to Related Works
Directly Related to This Work
Article DOI
References Cited
  1. Does Hydrogen have a place in the energy transition? É. Beeker (2014), strategie.gouv.fr/sites/ strategie.gouv.fr/files/atoms/files/na-fs-hydrogene-anglais.pdf
  2. Green hydrogen: Energizing the path to net zero, Deloitte (2023), deloitte.com/global/en/issues /climate/green-hydrogen.html
  3. Making the breakthrough: Green hydrogen policies and technology costs, International Renewable Energy Agency, Abu Dhabi, irena.org/media/Files/IRENA /Agency/Publication/2020/Nov/IRENA_Green_Hydrogen_breakthrough_2021.pdf
  4. M. El-Shafie, Hydrogen production by water electrolysis technologies: A review, Results in Engineering Vol. 20 (2023), 101426, ISSN 2590-1230, 10.1016/j.rineng.2023.101426S https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rineng.2023.101426
  5. Sadeghi et al., Comparative economic and life cycle assessment of solar-based hydrogen production for oil and gas industries, Energy Vol. 208 (2020), 118347, 10.1016/j.energy.2020.118347 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2020.118347
  6. J.C. Koj, et al., Environmental impacts of power-to-X systems - A review of technological and methodological choices in Life Cycle Assessments, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews Vol. 112 (2019), 865-879, 10.1016/j.rser.2019.06.029 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2019.06.029
  7. J. Wilkinson et al., Review and meta-analysis of recent life cycle assessments of hydrogen production, Cleaner Environmental Systems Vol. 9 (2023), 100116, 10.1016/j.cesys.2023.100116 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cesys.2023.100116
  8. S. Krishnan et al., Prospective LCA of alkaline and PEM electrolyser systems, Int. J. H. Energy Vol. 55 (2024), 26-41, 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2023.10.192 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2023.10.192
  9. G. Zhao et al., Life cycle assessment of H2O electrolysis technologies, Int. J. H. Energy Vol. 45 (2020), 23765-781, 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2020.05.282 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2020.05.282
  10. N. Sabio et al., Holistic minimization of the life cycle environmental impact of hydrogen infrastructures using multi-objective optimization and principal component analysis, Int. J. H. Energy Vol. 37 (2012), 5385-5405, ISSN 0360-3199, 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2011.09.039 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2011.09.039
  11. R. Luise, Développement par approche ascendante de méthodes et d'outils de conception de chaînes logistiques « hydrogène décarboné » : application au cas de la France, Toulouse INP, 10/2023, theses.fr/2023INPT0083
  12. RTE Réseau de Transport d'Electricité. Futurs énergétiques 2050, Rapport complet, 2022
  13. Sharma et al., Integration of life cycle assessment with energy simulation software for PEM electrolysis, Procedia CIRP Vol. 90 (2020), 176-181, 10.1016/j.procir.2020.02.139 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2020.02.139
  14. Share of average plant load factor in France, statista.com
  15. A. Sola et al., Green Hydrogen and supply chain. A critical assessment of the environmental impact, Adv. Sust. Systems Vol. 9 (2025), 2400708, 10.1002/adsu.202400708 https://doi.org/10.1002/adsu.202400708
  16. T. Terlouw et al., Future hydrogen economies imply environmental trade-offs and a supply-demand mismatch, Nature communications Vol. 15 (2024), 7043, 10.1038/s41467-024-51251-7 https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-024-51251-7
  17. Silva Ortiz et al., Environmental Assessment of Liquid Hydrogen Production Routes, Chemical Engineering Transactions Vol. 109 (2024), 583-588, 10.3303/CET24109098
  18. G. Naumann et al., Dynamic life cycle assessment of European electricity generation based on a retrospective approach, Energy Conversion and Management Vol. 311 (2024), 118520, 10.1016/j.enconman.2024.118520 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2024.118520
  19. A. Mio et al., Sust. Analysis of Hydrogen Production Processes, Int. J. H. Energy Vol. 54 (2024), 540-553, 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2023.06.122 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2023.06.122