Proceedings of ESCAPE 35ISSN: 2818-4734
Volume: 4 (2025)
Table of Contents
LAPSE:2025.0483
Published Article
LAPSE:2025.0483
Life Cycle Assessment of Synthetic Methanol Production: Integrating Alkaline Electrolysis and Direct Air Capture Across Regional Grid Scenarios
Ankur Singhal, Pratham Arora
June 27, 2025
Abstract
A transition to low-carbon fuels is integral in addressing the challenge of climate change. An essential transformation is underway in the transportation sector, one of the primary sources of global greenhouse gas emissions. The electrofuels that represent methanol synthesis via power-to-fuel technology have the potential to decarbonize the sector. This paper outlines a critical comprehensive life cycle assessment for electrofuels, with this study focusing on the production of synthetic methanol from renewable hydrogen from water electrolysis coupled with carbon from the direct air capture (DAC) process. This study has provided a comparison of the environmental impacts of synthetic methanol produced from grids of five regions (India, the US, China, Switzerland, and the EU) with conventional methanol from coal gasification and natural gas reforming. The results from this impact assessment show a high dependency of environmental scores on the footprint of the grid. Switzerland, with its limited usage of fossil fuels in grid electricity, has shown the least environmental damage in most of the impact categories in comparison to more non-renewable grids like India and China. Interestingly, conventional methanol has proved to be more environmentally friendly when compared with non-renewable grids like India and China in most of the impact categories.
Suggested Citation
Singhal A, Arora P. Life Cycle Assessment of Synthetic Methanol Production: Integrating Alkaline Electrolysis and Direct Air Capture Across Regional Grid Scenarios. Systems and Control Transactions 4:2057-2062 (2025) https://doi.org/10.69997/sct.187804
Author Affiliations
Singhal A: Indian Institute of Technology Roorkee, Department of Hydro and Renewable Energy, Roorkee, Uttarakhand, India
Arora P: Indian Institute of Technology Roorkee, Department of Hydro and Renewable Energy, Roorkee, Uttarakhand, India
Journal Name
Systems and Control Transactions
Volume
4
First Page
2057
Last Page
2062
Year
2025
Publication Date
2025-07-01
Version Comments
Original Submission
Other Meta
PII: 2057-2062-1501-SCT-4-2025, Publication Type: Journal Article
Record Map
Published Article

LAPSE:2025.0483
This Record
External Link

https://doi.org/10.69997/sct.187804
Article DOI
Download
Files
Jun 27, 2025
Main Article
License
CC BY-SA 4.0
Meta
Record Statistics
Record Views
396
Version History
[v1] (Original Submission)
Jun 27, 2025
 
Verified by curator on
Jun 27, 2025
This Version Number
v1
Citations
Most Recent
This Version
URL Here
http://psecommunity.org/LAPSE:2025.0483
 
Record Owner
PSE Press
Links to Related Works
Directly Related to This Work
Article DOI
References Cited
  1. N. von der Assen, J. Jung, and A. Bardow, "Life-cycle assessment of carbon dioxide capture and utilization: avoiding the pitfalls," Energy Environ Sci, vol. 6, no. 9, p. 2721, 2013, https://doi.org/10.1039/c3ee41151f
  2. T. Sakakura, J.-C. Choi, and H. Yasuda, "Transformation of Carbon Dioxide," Chem Rev, vol. 107, no. 6, pp. 2365-2387, Jun. 2007, https://doi.org/10.1021/cr068357u
  3. M. Aresta, Ed., Carbon Dioxide as Chemical Feedstock. Wiley, 2010. https://doi.org/10.1002/9783527629916
  4. F. T. Zangeneh, S. Sahebdelfar, and M. T. Ravanchi, "Conversion of carbon dioxide to valuable petrochemicals: An approach to clean development mechanism," Journal of Natural Gas Chemistry, vol. 20, no. 3, pp. 219-231, May 2011, https://doi.org/10.1016/S1003-9953(10)60191-0
  5. M. Fasihi, O. Efimova, and C. Breyer, "Techno-economic assessment of CO2 direct air capture plants," J Clean Prod, vol. 224, pp. 957-980, Jul. 2019, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.03.086
  6. D. Huisingh, Z. Zhang, J. C. Moore, Q. Qiao, and Q. Li, "Recent advances in carbon emissions reduction: policies, technologies, monitoring, assessment and modeling," J Clean Prod, vol. 103, pp. 1-12, Sep. 2015, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.04.098
  7. D. Casaban and E. Tsalaporta, "Life Cycle Assessment of a Direct Air Capture and Storage plant in Ireland," Jul. 14, 2023. https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-3145370/v1
  8. P. Biernacki, T. Röther, W. Paul, P. Werner, and S. Steinigeweg, "Environmental impact of the excess electricity conversion into methanol," J Clean Prod, vol. 191, pp. 87-98, Aug. 2018, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.04.232
  9. J. Artz et al., "Sustainable Conversion of Carbon Dioxide: An Integrated Review of Catalysis and Life Cycle Assessment," Chem Rev, vol. 118, no. 2, pp. 434-504, Jan. 2018, https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemrev.7b00435
  10. T. Cordero-Lanzac et al., "A techno-economic and life cycle assessment for the production of green methanol from CO2: catalyst and process bottlenecks," Journal of Energy Chemistry, vol. 68, pp. 255-266, May 2022, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jechem.2021.09.045
  11. T. Cordero-Lanzac et al., "A CO2 valorization plant to produce light hydrocarbons: Kinetic model, process design and life cycle assessment," Journal of CO2 Utilization, vol. 67, p. 102337, Jan. 2023, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcou.2022.102337
  12. S. C. Galusnyak, L. Petrescu, D. A. Chisalita, and C.-C. Cormos, "Life cycle assessment of methanol production and conversion into various chemical intermediates and products," Energy, vol. 259, p. 124784, Nov. 2022, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2022.124784
  13. A. Sternberg, C. M. Jens, and A. Bardow, "Life cycle assessment of CO 2 -based C1-chemicals," Green Chemistry, vol. 19, no. 9, pp. 2244-2259, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1039/C6GC02852G
  14. S. Deutz and A. Bardow, "Life-cycle assessment of an industrial direct air capture process based on temperature-vacuum swing adsorption," Nat Energy, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 203-213, Feb. 2021, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41560-020-00771-9
  15. T. Terlouw, K. Treyer, C. Bauer, and M. Mazzotti, "Life Cycle Assessment of Direct Air Carbon Capture and Storage with Low-Carbon Energy Sources," Environ Sci Technol, vol. 55, no. 16, pp. 11397-11411, Aug. 2021, https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.1c03263
  16. D. Casaban and E. Tsalaporta, "Life cycle assessment of a direct air capture and storage plant in Ireland," Sci Rep, vol. 13, no. 1, Dec. 2023, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-44709-z
  17. M. Sánchez, E. Amores, L. Rodríguez, and C. Clemente-Jul, "Semi-empirical model and experimental validation for the performance evaluation of a 15 kW alkaline water electrolyzer," Int J Hydrogen Energy, vol. 43, no. 45, pp. 20332-20345, Nov. 2018, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2018.09.029
  18. M. Sánchez, E. Amores, D. Abad, L. Rodríguez, and C. Clemente-Jul, "Aspen Plus model of an alkaline electrolysis system for hydrogen production," Int J Hydrogen Energy, vol. 45, no. 7, pp. 3916-3929, Feb. 2020, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2019.12.027
  19. R. Gonzalez-Olmos, A. Gutierrez-Ortega, J. Sempere, and R. Nomen, "Zeolite versus carbon adsorbents in carbon capture: A comparison from an operational and life cycle perspective," Journal of CO2 Utilization, vol. 55, p. 101791, Jan. 2022, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcou.2021.101791
  20. N. Badger, R. Boylu, V. Ilojianya, M. Erguvan, and S. Amini, "A cradle-to-gate life cycle assessment of green methanol production using direct air capture," Energy Advances, vol. 3, no. 9, pp. 2311-2327, Aug. 2024, https://doi.org/10.1039/D4YA00316K
  21. IEA, "World Energy Statistics and Balances, https://www.iea.org/data-and-statistics/data-product/world-energy-statistics-and-balances," IEA, Paris, 2024