LAPSE:2025.0471v1
Published Article

LAPSE:2025.0471v1
Repurposing Existing Combined Cycle Power Plants with Methane Production for Renewable Energy Storage
June 27, 2025
Abstract
Energy storage is essential for transitioning to a renewable system based on renewable sources. To meet this challenge, Power-to-X technologies are attracting more attention. This work explores converting the excess of electric energy obtained from wind or solar sources into hydrogen and then into methane leveraging existing natural gas infrastructure for easier storage and transport. The process involves two stages: Firstly, the methane production step using Power-to-X technologies during excess renewable energy periods and, secondly, the electricity generation step during high demand with CO2 capture for reuse in methane synthesis, forming a closed carbon loop. In this way the Power-to-X process is integrated with repurposed combined cycle power plants (CCPPs) creating a Power-to-methane-to-power system. Two approaches are evaluated: oxy-combustion, which simplifies process CO2 purification and air combustion, which needs a more complex CO2 purification, such as amine absorption or PSA systems. The results show that ordinary combustion capturing CO2 by amines is the most profitable process, especially when it is assumed that the oxygen produced by the electrolyzer is sold. For a CCPP with a nominal capacity of 400MW, the cost of electricity production ranges from 450 $/MWh to 490 $/MWh when the income from oxygen sales is neglected. If the oxygen produced can be fully absorbed by the market, the electricity production cost decreases to 250 $/MWh and 300 $/MWh.
Energy storage is essential for transitioning to a renewable system based on renewable sources. To meet this challenge, Power-to-X technologies are attracting more attention. This work explores converting the excess of electric energy obtained from wind or solar sources into hydrogen and then into methane leveraging existing natural gas infrastructure for easier storage and transport. The process involves two stages: Firstly, the methane production step using Power-to-X technologies during excess renewable energy periods and, secondly, the electricity generation step during high demand with CO2 capture for reuse in methane synthesis, forming a closed carbon loop. In this way the Power-to-X process is integrated with repurposed combined cycle power plants (CCPPs) creating a Power-to-methane-to-power system. Two approaches are evaluated: oxy-combustion, which simplifies process CO2 purification and air combustion, which needs a more complex CO2 purification, such as amine absorption or PSA systems. The results show that ordinary combustion capturing CO2 by amines is the most profitable process, especially when it is assumed that the oxygen produced by the electrolyzer is sold. For a CCPP with a nominal capacity of 400MW, the cost of electricity production ranges from 450 $/MWh to 490 $/MWh when the income from oxygen sales is neglected. If the oxygen produced can be fully absorbed by the market, the electricity production cost decreases to 250 $/MWh and 300 $/MWh.
Record ID
Keywords
Subject
Suggested Citation
Santamaría D, Sánchez A, Martín M. Repurposing Existing Combined Cycle Power Plants with Methane Production for Renewable Energy Storage. Systems and Control Transactions 4:1981-1986 (2025) https://doi.org/10.69997/sct.158762
Author Affiliations
Santamaría D: Department of Chemical Engineering, University of Salamanca, Plz Caidos 1-5, 37008, Salamanca, Spain
Sánchez A: Department of Chemical Engineering, University of Salamanca, Plz Caidos 1-5, 37008, Salamanca, Spain
Martín M: Department of Chemical Engineering, University of Salamanca, Plz Caidos 1-5, 37008, Salamanca, Spain
Sánchez A: Department of Chemical Engineering, University of Salamanca, Plz Caidos 1-5, 37008, Salamanca, Spain
Martín M: Department of Chemical Engineering, University of Salamanca, Plz Caidos 1-5, 37008, Salamanca, Spain
Journal Name
Systems and Control Transactions
Volume
4
First Page
1981
Last Page
1986
Year
2025
Publication Date
2025-07-01
Version Comments
Original Submission
Other Meta
PII: 1981-1986-1244-SCT-4-2025, Publication Type: Journal Article
Record Map
Published Article

LAPSE:2025.0471v1
This Record
External Link

https://doi.org/10.69997/sct.158762
Article DOI
Download
Meta
Record Statistics
Record Views
375
Version History
[v1] (Original Submission)
Jun 27, 2025
Verified by curator on
Jun 27, 2025
This Version Number
v1
Citations
Most Recent
This Version
URL Here
http://psecommunity.org/LAPSE:2025.0471v1
Record Owner
PSE Press
Links to Related Works
References Cited
- Xiang Y, Cai L, Guan Y, Liu W, Han Y, & Liang Y. Study on the configuration of bottom cycle in natural gas combined cycle power plants integrated with oxy-fuel combustion. Appl Energy 212:465-477 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2017.12.049
- Strojny M, Gladysz P, Hanak D P, Nowak W. Comparative analysis of CO2 capture technologies using amine absorption and calcium looping integrated with natural gas combined cycle power plant. Energy 284:128599 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2023.128599
- Blanco H, Codina V, Laurent A, Nijs W, Maréchal F, Faaij A. Life cycle assessment integration into energy system models: An application for Power-to-Methane in the EU. Appl Energy 259: 114160 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2019.114160
- Guerras LS, Martín M. On the water footprint in power production: Sustainable design of wet cooling towers. Appl Energy 263:114620 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2020.114620
- Martín-Hernández E, Guerras LS, Martín M. Optimal technology selection for the biogas upgrading to biomethane. J. Clean. Prod. 267:122032 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.122032
- Chue KT, Kim JN, Yoo YJ, Cho SH, Yang RT. Comparison of activated carbon and zeolite 13X for CO2 recovery from flue gas by pressure swing adsorption. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 34(2):591-598 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1021/ie00041a020
- Akyüz ES, Telli E, Farsak M. Hydrogen generation electrolyzers: paving the way for sustainable energy. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 81: 1338-1362 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2024.07.175
- Stangeland K, Kalai D, Li H, Yu Z. CO2 methanation: the effect of catalysts and reaction conditions. Energy Procedia 105: 2022-2027 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2017.03.577
- Sinnott R, Gavin T. Costing and project evaluation. In: Chemical Engineering Design Ed: Butterworth-Heinemann. Elsevier (2019) https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-102599-4.00006-0
- IPIECA. Combined-Cycle Gas Turbines. 2022. https://www.ipieca.org/resources/energy-efficiency-compendium-online/combined-cycle-gas-turbines-2022#

