Proceedings of ESCAPE 35ISSN: 2818-4734
Volume: 4 (2025)
Table of Contents
LAPSE:2025.0445
Published Article
LAPSE:2025.0445
Multi-Agent LLMs for Automating Sustainable Operational Decision-Making
Emma Pajak, Abdullah Bahamdan, Klaus Hellgardt, Antonio del Río-Chanona
June 27, 2025
Abstract
Operational decision-making in Process Systems Engineering (PSE) has achieved high proficiency at specific levels, such as supply chain optimization and unit-operation optimization. However, a critical challenge remains: integrating these layers of optimization into a cohesive, hierarchical decision-making framework that enables sustainable and automated operations. Addressing this challenge requires systems capable of coordinating multi-level decisions while maintaining interpretability and adaptability. Multi-agent frameworks based on Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated significant promise in other domains, successfully simulating traditional human decision-making tasks and tackling complex, multi-stage problems. This paper explores their potential application within operational decision-making for PSE, focusing on sustainability-driven objectives. A realistic Gas-Oil Separation Plant (GOSP) network is used as a case study, mimicking a hierarchical workflow that spans from initial back-of-the-envelope multi-objective optimization for cost-emissions trade-offs to a negotiation phase reflecting upper management decision-making, and culminating in high-fidelity simulations to validate operational setpoints at the plant level. This workflow serves as a canvas to assess the benefits of multi-agent LLMs, including their ability to integrate multi-layered decisions, enhance the explainability of strategies, and streamline automation in PSE workflows. The results demonstrate the potential of multi-agent LLMs to address the integration challenge in PSE, supporting sustainable and efficient operational decisions. Beyond GOSPs, this research highlights promising applications of multi-agent LLMs across process engineering, contributing to the vision of hierarchical, automated decision-making for the ‘plant of the future,’ where diverse models and tools operate within an intelligent, unified framework.
Keywords
large language models LLMs, operational decision-making, Optimization, Renewable and Sustainable Energy
Suggested Citation
Pajak E, Bahamdan A, Hellgardt K, Río-Chanona A. Multi-Agent LLMs for Automating Sustainable Operational Decision-Making. Systems and Control Transactions 4:1824-1829 (2025) https://doi.org/10.69997/sct.156776
Author Affiliations
Pajak E: Imperial College London, Department of Chemical Engineering, London, United Kingdom
Bahamdan A: Imperial College London, Department of Chemical Engineering, London, United Kingdom
Hellgardt K: Imperial College London, Department of Chemical Engineering, London, United Kingdom
Río-Chanona A: Imperial College London, Department of Chemical Engineering, London, United Kingdom
Journal Name
Systems and Control Transactions
Volume
4
First Page
1824
Last Page
1829
Year
2025
Publication Date
2025-07-01
Version Comments
Original Submission
Other Meta
PII: 1824-1829-1529-SCT-4-2025, Publication Type: Journal Article
Record Map
Published Article

LAPSE:2025.0445
This Record
External Link

https://doi.org/10.69997/sct.156776
Article DOI
Download
Files
Jun 27, 2025
Main Article
License
CC BY-SA 4.0
Meta
Record Statistics
Record Views
1303
Version History
[v1] (Original Submission)
Jun 27, 2025
 
Verified by curator on
Jun 27, 2025
This Version Number
v1
Citations
Most Recent
This Version
URL Here
http://psecommunity.org/LAPSE:2025.0445
 
Record Owner
PSE Press
Links to Related Works
Directly Related to This Work
Article DOI
References Cited
  1. B. Decardi-Nelson, A. S. Alshehri, A. Ajagekar, and F. You, "Generative AI and process systems engineering: The next frontier," Computers & Chemical Engineering, vol. 187, p. 108723, Aug. 2024, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compchemeng.2024.108723
  2. E. Hirtreiter, L. S. Balhorn, and A. M. Schweidtmann, "Towards automatic generation of Piping and Instrumentation Diagrams (P&IDs) with Artificial Intelligence," AIChE Journal, vol. 70, no. 1, p. e18259, Jan. 2024, https://doi.org/10.1002/aic.18259
  3. A. Khan, R. Nahar, H. Chen, G. E. C. Flores, and C. Li, "FaultExplainer: Leveraging Large Language Models for Interpretable Fault Detection and Diagnosis," Dec. 19, 2024, arXiv: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compchemeng.2025.109152
  4. T. Guo et al., "Large Language Model based Multi-Agents: A Survey of Progress and Challenges," Apr. 19, 2024, arXiv:
  5. K. Sreedhar and L. Chilton, "Simulating Human Strategic Behavior: Comparing Single and Multi-agent LLMs," Jul. 02, 2024, arXiv:
  6. J. Li, Q. Zhang, Y. Yu, Q. Fu, and D. Ye, "More Agents Is All You Need," Oct. 11, 2024, arXiv:
  7. J. Wang, J. Wang, B. Athiwaratkun, C. Zhang, and J. Zou, "Mixture-of-Agents Enhances Large Language Model Capabilities," Jun. 07, 2024, arXiv:
  8. X. Li, S. Wang, S. Zeng, Y. Wu, and Y. Yang, "A survey on LLM-based multi-agent systems: workflow, infrastructure, and challenges," Vicinagearth, vol. 1, no. 1, p. 9, Oct. 2024, https://doi.org/10.1007/s44336-024-00009-2
  9. C. Qian et al., "ChatDev: Communicative Agents for Software Development," in Proceedings of the 62nd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers), L.-W. Ku, A. Martins, and V. Srikumar, Eds., Bangkok, Thailand: Association for Computational Linguistics, Aug. 2024, pp. 15174-15186. https://aclanthology.org/2024.acl-long.810 https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/2024.acl-long.810
  10. [J. Vyas and M. Mercangöz, "Autonomous Industrial Control using an Agentic Framework with Large Language Models," Nov. 08, 2024, arXiv:
  11. A. Bahamdan, N. Shah, and A. del Rio-Chanona, "Surrogate Based Mixed Integer Linear Programming Model for Decarbonization of an Integrated Gas-Oil Separation Network," in Computer Aided Chemical Engineering, vol. 53, F. Manenti and G. V. Reklaitis, Eds., in 34 European Symposium on Computer Aided Process Engineering / 15 International Symposium on Process Systems Engineering, vol. 53. Elsevier, 2024, pp. 2209-2214. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-443-28824-1.50369-0
  12. Hugging Face Llama-3-8B. https://huggingface.co/Groq/Llama-3-Groq-8B-Tool-Use
  13. T. Händler, "Balancing Autonomy and Alignment: A Multi-Dimensional Taxonomy for Autonomous LLM-powered Multi-Agent Architectures," Oct. 05, 2023, arXiv: https://doi.org/10.5220/0012239100003598
  14. P. Lewis et al., "Retrieval-augmented generation for knowledge-intensive NLP tasks," in Proceedings of the 34th International Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems, in NIPS '20. Red Hook, NY, USA: Curran Associates Inc., Dec. 2020, pp. 9459-9474
  15. "Summary of Global Climate Action at COP 28 | UNFCCC." https://unfccc.int/documents/636485