Proceedings of ESCAPE 35ISSN: 2818-4734
Volume: 4 (2025)
Table of Contents
LAPSE:2025.0411
Published Article
LAPSE:2025.0411
Optimizing Industrial Heat Electrification: Balancing Cost and Emissions
Soha Mousa, Dhabia Al-Mohannadi
June 27, 2025
Abstract
The electrification of industrial heat is a promising pathway for decarbonization, yet challenges persist in balancing capital costs, operating costs, and emissions reduction. While previous studies have assessed electrification through heat integration and graphical methods, these approaches do not inherently determine the optimal hybrid technology configuration. This study introduces an optimization-based framework that systematically evaluates the cost-optimal allocation of electrified and conventional heating technologies. Formulated as a Mixed-Integer Linear Programming (MILP) model and implemented in Gurobi, the framework minimizes Total Annualized Cost (TAC) while satisfying heat demand, technology constraints, and emissions targets. Applied to an industrial case study, the model compares three scenarios: a fully conventional system relying on steam boilers and fired heaters, a fully electrified system utilizing high-temperature heat pumps, electrode boilers, and electric heaters, and an optimized hybrid system that strategically integrates both conventional and electrified technologies. The results demonstrate that the optimized hybrid system achieves a 75% electrification rate, reducing TAC by 7% compared to previous graphical electrification assessments. The model selects a combination of a high-temperature heat pump and a steam boiler, highlighting the importance of accounting for heat pump cost savings in economic evaluations. Additionally, a comparison with Carbon Capture and Storage (CCS) reveals that partial electrification results in a lower CO2 abatement cost of 131 $/tCO2, compared to 140 $/tCO2 for CCS, reinforcing the economic viability of industrial heat electrification. This study provides a systematic optimization framework for guiding industrial electrification decisions and emphasizes the role of carbon taxation, electricity pricing, and renewable energy incentives in shaping cost-effectiveness. The findings underscore the importance of integrating process optimization with techno-economic analysis to accelerate industrial decarbonization.
Suggested Citation
Mousa S, Al-Mohannadi D. Optimizing Industrial Heat Electrification: Balancing Cost and Emissions. Systems and Control Transactions 4:1612-1617 (2025) https://doi.org/10.69997/sct.113100
Author Affiliations
Mousa S: Texas A&M University at Qatar, Department of Chemical Engineering, Doha, Qatar
Al-Mohannadi D: Texas A&M University at Qatar, Department of Chemical Engineering, Doha, Qatar
Journal Name
Systems and Control Transactions
Volume
4
First Page
1612
Last Page
1617
Year
2025
Publication Date
2025-07-01
Version Comments
Original Submission
Other Meta
PII: 1612-1617-1713-SCT-4-2025, Publication Type: Journal Article
Record Map
Published Article

LAPSE:2025.0411
This Record
External Link

https://doi.org/10.69997/sct.113100
Article DOI
Download
Files
Jun 27, 2025
Main Article
License
CC BY-SA 4.0
Meta
Record Statistics
Record Views
648
Version History
[v1] (Original Submission)
Jun 27, 2025
 
Verified by curator on
Jun 27, 2025
This Version Number
v1
Citations
Most Recent
This Version
URL Here
http://psecommunity.org/LAPSE:2025.0411
 
Record Owner
PSE Press
Links to Related Works
Directly Related to This Work
Article DOI
References Cited
  1. McMillan, C. A. (2018). Electrification of Industry: Summary of Electrification Futures Study Industrial Sector analysis. https://doi.org/10.2172/1474033
  2. Bouckaert, S., Pales, A. F., McGlade, C., Remme, U., Wanner, B., Varro, L., D'Ambrosio, D., & Spencer, T. (2021). Net Zero by 2050: A roadmap for the global energy sector. Retrieved February 1, 2025, from https://trid.trb.org/view/1856381
  3. Madeddu, S., Ueckerdt, F., Pehl, M., Peterseim, J., Lord, M., Kumar, K. A., Krüger, C., & Luderer, G. (2020). The CO2 reduction potential for the European industry via direct electrification of heat supply (power-to-heat). Environmental Research Letters, 15(12), 124004. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/abbd02
  4. Schoeneberger, C., Zhang, J., McMillan, C., Dunn, J. B., & Masanet, E. (2022). Electrification potential of U.S. industrial boilers and assessment of the GHG emissions impact. Advances in Applied Energy, 5, 100089. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adapen.2022.100089
  5. Schüwer, D., & Schneider, C. (2018). Electrification of industrial process heat : long-term applications, potentials and impacts(pp. 411-422). https://epub.wupperinst.org/files/7037/7037_Schuewer.pdf
  6. Masuku, C. M., Caulkins, R. S., & Siirola, J. J. (2024). Process decarbonization through electrification. Current Opinion in Chemical Engineering, 44, 101011. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coche.2024.101011
  7. Veronezi, D., Soulier, M., & Kocsis, T. (2024). Energy solutions for decarbonization of industrial heat processes. Energies, 17(22), 5728. https://doi.org/10.3390/en17225728
  8. Arpagaus, C., Bless, F., Uhlmann, M., Schiffmann, J., & Bertsch, S. S. (2018). High temperature heat pumps: Market overview, state of the art, research status, refrigerants, and application potentials. Energy, 152, 985-1010. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2018.03.166
  9. Zühlsdorf, B., Jensen, J. K., & Elmegaard, B. (2018). Heat pump working fluid selection-economic and thermodynamic comparison of criteria and boundary conditions. International Journal of Refrigeration, 98, 500-513. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrefrig.2018.11.034
  10. Xia, R., Overa, S., & Jiao, F. (2022). Emerging Electrochemical Processes to Decarbonize the Chemical Industry. JACS Au, 2(5), 1054-1070. https://doi.org/10.1021/jacsau.2c00138
  11. Barton, J. L. (2020). Electrification of the chemical industry. Science, 368(6496), 1181-1182. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.abb8061
  12. Lechtenböhmer, S., Nilsson, L. J., Åhman, M., & Schneider, C. (2016). Decarbonising the energy intensive basic materials industry through electrification - Implications for future EU electricity demand. Energy, 115, 1623-1631. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2016.07.110
  13. Kosmadakis, G. (2019). Estimating the potential of industrial (high-temperature) heat pumps for exploiting waste heat in EU industries. Applied Thermal Engineering, 156, 287-298. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2019.04.082
  14. Bühler, F., Zühlsdorf, B., Holm, F. M., & Elmegaard, B. (2019). The potential of heat pumps in the electrification of the Danish industry (pp. 51-67). https://backend.orbit.dtu.dk/ws/files/195360531/The_potential_of_heat_pumps_in_the_electrification_of_the_Danish.pdf
  15. Bataille, C., Åhman, M., Neuhoff, K., Nilsson, L. J., Fischedick, M., Lechtenböhmer, S., Solano-Rodriquez, B., Denis-Ryan, A., Stiebert, S., Waisman, H., Sartor, O., & Rahbar, S. (2018). A review of technology and policy deep decarbonization pathway options for making energy-intensive industry production consistent with the Paris Agreement. Journal of Cleaner Production, 187, 960-973. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.03.107
  16. Mousa S., Al-Mohannadi D.M., 2024, A Systematic Electrification Approach: Electrifying Natural Gas Processing for a Net-Zero Future, Chemical Engineering Transactions, 114, 301-306
  17. Smith R., 2016, Chemical Process Design and Integration, Wiley, Hoboken, USA
  18. Sahl, A. B., Orosz, Á., How, B. S., Friedler, F., & Teng, S. Y. (2023). Electrification of oil refineries through multi-objective multi-period graph-theoretical planning: A crude distillation unit case study. Journal of Cleaner Production, 434, 140179. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.140179
  19. Rastinejad, J., Putnam, S., & Stuber, M. D. (2023). Technoeconomic assessment of solar technologies for the hybridization of industrial process heat systems using deterministic global dynamic optimization. Renewable Energy, 216, 119069. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2023.119069