Proceedings of ESCAPE 35ISSN: 2818-4734
Volume: 4 (2025)
Table of Contents
LAPSE:2025.0352
Published Article
LAPSE:2025.0352
Efficient approximation of the Koopman operator for large-scale nonlinear systems
Gajanand Verma, William Heath, Constantinos Theodoropoulos
June 27, 2025
Abstract
Implementing Model Predictive Control (MPC) for large-scale nonlinear systems is often computationally challenging due to the intensive online optimization required. To address this, various reduced-order linearization techniques have been developed. The Koopman operator linearizes a nonlinear system by mapping it into an infinite-dimensional space of observables, enabling the application of linear control strategies. While Artificial Neural Networks (ANNs) can approximate the Koopman operator in a data-driven manner, training these networks becomes computationally intensive for high-dimensional systems as the lifting into a higher-dimensional observable space significantly increases data size and complexity. In this work, we propose a technique, combining Proper Orthogonal Decomposition (POD) with an efficient ANN structure to reduce the training time of ANN for large order systems. By first applying POD, we obtain a low order projection of the system. Subsequently, we train the ANN with an efficient structure to approximate the Koopman operator, significantly decreasing training time without sacrificing accuracy.
Keywords
efficient training of NN, Koopman operator, large-scale systems, Model Predictive Control, MPC, nonlinear control, nonlinear systems
Suggested Citation
Verma G, Heath W, Theodoropoulos C. Efficient approximation of the Koopman operator for large-scale nonlinear systems. Systems and Control Transactions 4:1251-1256 (2025) https://doi.org/10.69997/sct.169758
Author Affiliations
Verma G: Department Chemical Engineering, The University of Manchester, Manchester, M13 9PL, UK
Heath W: School of Computer Science and Engineering, Bangor University, Bangor, LL57 1UT, UK
Theodoropoulos C: Department Chemical Engineering, The University of Manchester, Manchester, M13 9PL, UK
Journal Name
Systems and Control Transactions
Volume
4
First Page
1251
Last Page
1256
Year
2025
Publication Date
2025-07-01
Version Comments
Original Submission
Other Meta
PII: 1251-1256-1719-SCT-4-2025, Publication Type: Journal Article
Record Map
Published Article

LAPSE:2025.0352
This Record
External Link

https://doi.org/10.69997/sct.169758
Article DOI
Download
Files
Jun 27, 2025
Main Article
License
CC BY-SA 4.0
Meta
Record Statistics
Record Views
1095
Version History
[v1] (Original Submission)
Jun 27, 2025
 
Verified by curator on
Jun 27, 2025
This Version Number
v1
Citations
Most Recent
This Version
URL Here
http://psecommunity.org/LAPSE:2025.0352
 
Record Owner
PSE Press
Links to Related Works
Directly Related to This Work
Article DOI
References Cited
  1. Mayne D. Nonlinear model predictive control: Challenges and opportunities. Nonlinear model predictive control. 2000;23-44 https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-0348-8407-5_2
  2. Rawlings JB, Mayne DQ, Diehl M, others. Model predictive control: theory, computation, and design. Vol. 2. Nob Hill Publishing Madison, WI; 2017
  3. Theodoropoulos C. Optimisation and linear control of large scale nonlinear systems: A review and a suite of model reduction-based techniques. Coping with complexity: Model reduction and data analysis. 2010;37-61 https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-14941-2_3
  4. Xie W, Bonis I, Theodoropoulos C. Data-driven model reduction-based nonlinear MPC for large-scale distributed parameter systems. Journal of Process Control. 2015;35:959-1524 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jprocont.2015.07.009
  5. Peter B, GRIVET TALOCIA S, Alfio Q, Gianluigi R, Wil S, Silveira LM, et al. Model Order Reduction. Volume 1: System-and Data-Driven Methods and Algorithms. 2021;
  6. Adel A, Salah K. Model order reduction using genetic algorithm. In: 2016 IEEE 7th Annual Ubiquitous Computing, Electronics & Mobile Communication Conference (UEMCON). IEEE; 2016. p. 1-6 https://doi.org/10.1109/UEMCON.2016.7777856
  7. San O, Maulik R, Ahmed M. An artificial neural network framework for reduced order modeling of transient flows. Communications in Nonlinear Science and Numerical Simulation. 2019;77:271-87 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cnsns.2019.04.025
  8. Bonis I, Xie W, Theodoropoulos C. A linear model predictive control algorithm for nonlinear large-scale distributed parameter systems. AIChE Journal. 2012;58(3):801-11 https://doi.org/10.1002/aic.12626
  9. Korda M, Mezic I. Linear predictors for nonlinear dynamical systems: Koopman operator meets model predictive control. Automatica. 2018 Jul;93:149-60 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.automatica.2018.03.046
  10. Mamakoukas G, Di Cairano S, Vinod AP. Robust Model Predictive Control with Data-Driven Koopman Operators. In: 2022 American Control Conference (ACC). 2022. p. 3885-92 https://doi.org/10.23919/ACC53348.2022.9867811
  11. Narasingam A, Son SH, Kwon JSI. Data-driven feedback stabilisation of nonlinear systems: Koopman-based model predictive control. International Journal of Control. 2023;96(3):770-81 https://doi.org/10.1080/00207179.2021.2013541
  12. Otto SE, Rowley CW. Koopman operators for estimation and control of dynamical systems. Annual Review of Control, Robotics, and Autonomous Systems. 2021;4(1):59-87 https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-control-071020-010108
  13. Williams MO, Kevrekidis IG, Rowley CW. A data-driven approximation of the koopman operator: Extending dynamic mode decomposition. Journal of Nonlinear Science. 2015;25:1307-46 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00332-015-9258-5
  14. Koopman BO. Hamiltonian systems and transformation in Hilbert space. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 1931;17(5):315-8 https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.17.5.315
  15. Wang M, Lou X, Wu W, Cui B. Koopman-based MPC with learned dynamics: Hierarchical neural network approach. IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems. 2022;
  16. Xiao Y, Zhang X, Xu X, Liu X, Liu J. Deep Neural Networks With Koopman Operators for Modeling and Control of Autonomous Vehicles. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Vehicles. 2023;8(1):135-46 https://doi.org/10.1109/TIV.2022.3180337
  17. Verma G, Heath W, Theodoropoulos C. Robust stability analysis of Koopman based MPC system. In: Computer Aided Chemical Engineering. Elsevier; 2024. p. 1927-32 https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-443-28824-1.50322-7
  18. Zhang X, Han M, Yin X. Reduced-order Koopman modeling and predictive control of nonlinear processes. Computers & Chemical Engineering. 2023;179:108440 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compchemeng.2023.108440
  19. Taira K, Brunton S, Dawson S, Rowley C, Colonius T, McKeon B, et al. Modal analysis of fluid flows: An overview. AIAA journal. 2017;55(12):4013-41 https://doi.org/10.2514/1.J056060
  20. Nguyen VB, Tran SBQ, Khan SA, Rong J, Lou J. POD-DEIM model order reduction technique for model predictive control in continuous chemical processing. Computers & Chemical Engineering. 2020;133:106638 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compchemeng.2019.106638
  21. Rizzo C, de Barros F, Perotto S, Oldani L, Guadagnini A. Adaptive POD model reduction for solute transport in heterogeneous porous media. Computational Geosciences. 2018;22:297-308 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10596-017-9693-5
  22. Jensen KF, Ray WH. The bifurcation behavior of tubular reactors. Computers and Chemical Engineering. 1982;37:199-222 https://doi.org/10.1016/0009-2509(82)80155-3
(0.11 seconds)

[0.11 s]