Proceedings of ESCAPE 35ISSN: 2818-4734
Volume: 4 (2025)
Table of Contents
LAPSE:2025.0327v1
Published Article
LAPSE:2025.0327v1
Utilizing ML Surrogates in CAPD: Case Study of an Amine-based Carbon-Capture Process
Florian Baakes, Gustavo Chaparro, Thomas Bernet, George Jackson, Amparo Galindo, Claire S. Adjiman
June 27, 2025
Abstract
Anthropogenic carbon-dioxide emissions, exceeding 51 billion tons annually, are a major driver of global climate impacts. Aqueous amine scrubbing offers an effective carbon-capture solution, but the energy-intensive thermal regeneration step of the process significantly increases costs, limiting large-scale adoption. To address these challenges, computational optimization of process and molecular design is promising but often too resource-intensive, emphasizing the need for efficient surrogate models. Specifically, we develop a surrogate model based on an artificial neural network (ANN) that is employed to replace rigorous phase-equilibrium computations performed with the SAFT-? Mie group contribution method within a steady-state aqueous amine carbon-capture process model. Our ANN is trained on 32,768 vapour–liquid equilibrium data points of a quaternary mixture of water, monoethanolamine, carbon dioxide, and nitrogen over industrially relevant temperature, pressure, and composition ranges, achieving mean-relative errors below 2% for most variables. The ANN is integrated into a computer aided process design (CAPD) framework and evaluated via mathematical optimization, with the total annualized cost (TAC) as the objective function. Compared to the rigorous process model, the model with the ANN surrogate exhibits reduced computational times of up to 81% while converging to near-identical optima within 1% of the TAC. With a robustness analysis across the lean-loading and desorber-pressure design space we show that the ANN effectively captures 90% of the investigated design space, vs. 77% for the rigorous model. In a multi-start optimization ensuring global optimality, the surrogate converges to the same point as the rigorous model, taking 10 h less. This demonstrates that carefully trained surrogate models can significantly accelerate process optimization and enable larger-scale applications, paving the way for future solvent and process co-design efforts.
Suggested Citation
Baakes F, Chaparro G, Bernet T, Jackson G, Galindo A, Adjiman CS. Utilizing ML Surrogates in CAPD: Case Study of an Amine-based Carbon-Capture Process. Systems and Control Transactions 4:1089-1094 (2025) https://doi.org/10.69997/sct.122609
Author Affiliations
Baakes F: Department of Chemical Engineering, Sargent Centre for Process Systems Engineering, Imperial College London, South Kensington Campus, SW7 2AZ, London, UK
Chaparro G: Department of Chemical Engineering, Sargent Centre for Process Systems Engineering, Imperial College London, South Kensington Campus, SW7 2AZ, London, UK
Bernet T: Department of Chemical Engineering, Sargent Centre for Process Systems Engineering, Imperial College London, South Kensington Campus, SW7 2AZ, London, UK
Jackson G: Department of Chemical Engineering, Sargent Centre for Process Systems Engineering, Imperial College London, South Kensington Campus, SW7 2AZ, London, UK
Galindo A: Department of Chemical Engineering, Sargent Centre for Process Systems Engineering, Imperial College London, South Kensington Campus, SW7 2AZ, London, UK
Adjiman CS: Department of Chemical Engineering, Sargent Centre for Process Systems Engineering, Imperial College London, South Kensington Campus, SW7 2AZ, London, UK
Journal Name
Systems and Control Transactions
Volume
4
First Page
1089
Last Page
1094
Year
2025
Publication Date
2025-07-01
Version Comments
Original Submission
Other Meta
PII: 1089-1094-1350-SCT-4-2025, Publication Type: Journal Article
Record Map
Published Article

LAPSE:2025.0327v1
This Record
External Link

https://doi.org/10.69997/sct.122609
Article DOI
Download
Files
Jun 27, 2025
Main Article
License
CC BY-SA 4.0
Meta
Record Statistics
Record Views
494
Version History
[v1] (Original Submission)
Jun 27, 2025
 
Verified by curator on
Jun 27, 2025
This Version Number
v1
Citations
Most Recent
This Version
URL Here
http://psecommunity.org/LAPSE:2025.0327v1
 
Record Owner
PSE Press
Links to Related Works
Directly Related to This Work
Article DOI
References Cited
  1. H., Ritchie; P., Rosado and M. Roser. https://ourworldindata.org/co2-and-greenhouse-gas-emissions visited on: 28.01.2025
  2. M., Bui et al. Carbon capture and storage (CCS): the way forward, Energy Environ. Sci. 11: 5 (2018) https://doi.org/10.1039/C7EE02342A
  3. A. M., Schweidtmann et al. A review and perspective on hybrid modelling methodologies. Dig. Chem. Eng. 10:100136 (2023) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dche.2023.100136
  4. L., Lee et al. Enabling the direct solution of challenging computer-aided molecular and process design problems: Chemical absorption of carbon dioxide. Comp. Chem. Eng. 174: 108204 (2023) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compchemeng.2023.108204
  5. K., McBride and K., Sundmacher. Overview of Surrogate Modeling in Chemical Process Engineering. Chem. Ing. Tech. 91:228-239 (2019) https://doi.org/10.1002/cite.201800091
  6. R., Misener and L., Biegler. Formulating data-driven surrogate models for process optimization. Comp. Chem. Eng. 179:108411 (2023) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compchemeng.2023.108411
  7. X., Zhang et al. Integrated ionic liquid and rate-based absorption process design for gas separation: Global optimization using hybrid models. AIChE J. 67:e17340(2021) https://doi.org/10.1002/aic.17340
  8. T., Karia et al. Classifier Surrogates to ensure phase stability in optimization-based design of solvent mixtures. Dig. Chem. Eng. 100200 (2024) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dche.2024.100200
  9. L., Zhang et al. Comparative study of classifier models to assert phase stability in multicomponent mixtures. CAPE J.. 53:1465-1470(2024) https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-443-28824-1.50245-3
  10. C., Nentwich et al. Optimization of chemical processes applying surrogate models for phase equilibrium calculations. IJCNN: 1-8 (2019) https://doi.org/10.1109/IJCNN.2019.8851816
  11. T., Forster et al. Algebraic surrogate-based process optimization using Bayesian symbolic learning. AIChE J. 69: e18110 (2023) https://doi.org/10.1002/aic.18110
  12. V., Papaioannou et al. Group contribution methodology based on the statistical associating fluid theory for heteronuclear molecules formed from Mie segments. J. Chem. Phys. 140: 054107 (2014) https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4851455
  13. F., Perdomo et al. A predictive group-contribution framework for the thermodynamic modelling of CO2 absorption in cyclic amines, alkyl polyamines, alkanolamines and phase-change amines: New data and SAFT-? Mie parameters. Fluid Ph. Equilib. 566: 113635 (2023) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fluid.2022.113635
  14. L., Lee et al. A predictive model for the techno-economic assessment of CO2 chemisorption processes applicable to a large number of amine solvents. Chem. Eng. R&D. 200: 615-636 (2023) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cherd.2023.11.007
  15. C. V., Brand et al. On the use of molecular-based thermodynamic models to assess the performance of solvents for CO2 capture processes: monoethanolamine solutions. Faraday Discuss. 192: 337-390 (2016) https://doi.org/10.1039/C6FD00041J
  16. T., Akiba et al. Optuna: A Next-generation Hyperparameter Optimization Framework. Proc. ACM SIGKDD Int. Conf. Knowl. Discov. Data Min. 19: 2623-2631 (2019) https://doi.org/10.1145/3292500.3330701