Proceedings of ESCAPE 35ISSN: 2818-4734
Volume: 4 (2025)
Table of Contents
LAPSE:2025.0263v1
Published Article
LAPSE:2025.0263v1
Insights on CO2 Utilization through Reverse Water Gas Shift Reaction in Membrane Reactors: A Multi-scale Mathematical Modeling Approach
Zhaofeng Li, Anan Uziri, Zahir Aghayev, Burcu Beykal, Michael Patrascu
June 27, 2025
Abstract
The rising levels of carbon dioxide (CO2) in the atmosphere significantly contribute to climate change, highlighting the need for effective CO2 mitigation strategies. While capturing and storing CO2 is important, converting it into useful products offers additional environmental and economic benefits. One promising method is the reverse water gas shift (RWGS) reaction, which transforms CO2 into carbon monoxide (CO). Membrane reactors (MR), which integrate selective membranes with equilibrium limited chemical reactions, have the potential to intensify processes based on the RWGS reaction. In such reactors, by-products like water are removed in-situ from the reaction zone, effectively shifting the reaction equilibrium to favor higher CO2 conversion. This study develops a comprehensive multi-scale mathematical model for RWGS membrane reactors. We integrate the microscale permeance model (for LTA-4A membrane) with the RWGS MR unit scale and the system’s scale models. The effectiveness of applying sweep gas has been suggested, and the optimal H2 perm-selectivity is found in the range from 30 to 50. A detailed membrane permeance model for LTA-4A membranes is integrated in the MR model to assess how species permeance changes with varying reactor conditions. We propose a sweep recycle configuration and compare it with the conventional sweeping configuration commonly assumed in most literature. A thermal efficiency analysis is conducted to evaluate the proposed recycling configuration, providing insights into the practical feasibility of membrane reactors for CO2 utilization.
Suggested Citation
Li Z, Uziri A, Aghayev Z, Beykal B, Patrascu M. Insights on CO2 Utilization through Reverse Water Gas Shift Reaction in Membrane Reactors: A Multi-scale Mathematical Modeling Approach. Systems and Control Transactions 4:692-697 (2025) https://doi.org/10.69997/sct.177382
Author Affiliations
Li Z: Technion Israel Institute of Technology, Faculty of Chemical Engineering, Technion City, Haifa 3200003, Israel
Uziri A: Technion Israel Institute of Technology, Faculty of Chemical Engineering, Technion City, Haifa 3200003, Israel
Aghayev Z: University of Connecticut, Department of Chemical & Biomolecular Engineering, Storrs, CT, USA; University of Connecticut, Center for Clean Energy Engineering, Storrs, CT, USA
Beykal B: University of Connecticut, Department of Chemical & Biomolecular Engineering, Storrs, CT, USA; University of Connecticut, Center for Clean Energy Engineering, Storrs, CT, USA
Patrascu M: Technion Israel Institute of Technology, Faculty of Chemical Engineering, Technion City, Haifa 3200003, Israel; Technion Israel Institute of Technology, Grand Technion Energy Program, Technion City, Haifa 3200003, Israel
Journal Name
Systems and Control Transactions
Volume
4
First Page
692
Last Page
697
Year
2025
Publication Date
2025-07-01
Version Comments
Original Submission
Other Meta
PII: 0692-0697-1740-SCT-4-2025, Publication Type: Journal Article
Record Map
Published Article

LAPSE:2025.0263v1
This Record
External Link

https://doi.org/10.69997/sct.177382
Article DOI
Download
Files
Jun 27, 2025
Main Article
License
CC BY-SA 4.0
Meta
Record Statistics
Record Views
567
Version History
[v1] (Original Submission)
Jun 27, 2025
 
Verified by curator on
Jun 27, 2025
This Version Number
v1
Citations
Most Recent
This Version
URL Here
http://psecommunity.org/LAPSE:2025.0263v1
 
Record Owner
PSE Press
Links to Related Works
Directly Related to This Work
Article DOI
References Cited
  1. M. Genovese et al., "Power-to-hydrogen and hydrogen-to-X energy systems for the industry of the future in Europe," Int. J. Hydrogen Energy, vol. 48, no. 44, pp. 16545-16568, May 2023, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2023.01.194
  2. M. Patrascu, "Process intensification for decentralized production," Chem. Eng. Process. - Process Intensif., vol. 184, p. 109291, Feb. 2023, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cep.2023.109291
  3. E. Harkou et al., "Different reactor configurations for enhancement of CO2 methanation," Environ. Res., vol. 236, p. 116760, Nov. 2023, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2023.116760
  4. J. van Kampen et al., "Steam separation enhanced reactions: Review and outlook," Chem. Eng. J., vol. 374, pp. 1286-1303, Oct. 2019, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2019.06.031
  5. P. F. Zito et al., "Light gases saturation loading dependence on temperature in LTA 4A zeolite," Microporous Mesoporous Mater., vol. 249, pp. 67-77, Sep. 2017, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.micromeso.2017.04.021
  6. Z. Li et al., "High Temperature Water Permeable Membrane Reactors for CO2 Utilization," Chem. Eng. J., vol. 420, p. 129834, Sep. 2021, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2021.129834
  7. N. Wang et al., "Hydrophilic SOD and LTA membranes for membrane-supported methanol, dimethylether and dimethylcarbonate synthesis," Microporous Mesoporous Mater., vol. 207, pp. 33-38, May 2015, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.micromeso.2014.12.028
  8. P. F. Zito et al., "Water vapor permeation and its influence on gases through a zeolite-4A membrane," J. Memb. Sci., vol. 574, pp. 154-163, Mar. 2019, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2018.12.065
  9. N. Diban et al., "Membrane reactors for in situ water removal: A review of applications," Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., vol. 52, no. 31, pp. 10342-10354, Aug. 2013, https://doi.org/10.1021/ie3029625
  10. I. G. Wenten et al., "Zeolite membrane reactors: from preparation to application in heterogeneous catalytic reactions," React. Chem. Eng., vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 401-417, Mar. 2021, https://doi.org/10.1039/D0RE00388C
  11. F. Samimi et al., "Green Methanol Production Process from Indirect CO2 Conversion: RWGS Reactor versus RWGS Membrane Reactor," J. Environ. Chem. Eng., vol. 7, no. 1, p. 102813, Feb. 2019, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jece.2018.102813
  12. S. Dzuryk and E. Rezaei, "Dimensionless analysis of reverse water gas shift Packed-Bed membrane reactors," Chem. Eng. Sci., vol. 250, p. 117377, Mar. 2022, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ces.2021.117377
  13. E. Rezaei and S. Dzuryk, "Techno-economic comparison of reverse water gas shift reaction to steam and dry methane reforming reactions for syngas production," Chem. Eng. Res. Des., vol. 144, pp. 354-369, Apr. 2019, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cherd.2019.02.005
  14. S. Dzuryk and E. Rezaei, "Intensification of the Reverse Water Gas Shift Reaction by Water-Permeable Packed-Bed Membrane Reactors," Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., vol. 59, no. 42, pp. 18907-18920, Oct. 2020, https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.iecr.0c02213
  15. R. Krishna and J. A. Wesselingh, "The Maxwell-Stefan approach to mass transfer," Chem. Eng. Sci., vol. 52, no. 6, pp. 861-911, Mar. 1997, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0009-2509(96)00458-7
  16. M. J. L. Ginés et al., "Kinetic study of the reverse water-gas shift reaction over CuO/ZnO/Al2O3 catalysts," Appl. Catal. A Gen., vol. 154, no. 1-2, pp. 155-171, Jun. 1997, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0926-860X(96)00369-9