Proceedings of ESCAPE 35ISSN: 2818-4734
Volume: 4 (2025)
Table of Contents
LAPSE:2025.0237
Published Article
LAPSE:2025.0237
Synergies Between the Distillation of First- and Second-Generation Sugarcane Ethanol for Sustainable Biofuel Production
Luiz M. Costa, Abhay Athaley, Zach Losordo, Adriano P. Mariano, John Posada, Lee R. Lynd
June 27, 2025
Abstract
This work investigated synergies for improved energy efficiency between integrated first- (1G) and second-generation (2G) sugarcane ethanol distillation, an energy-intensive unit operation, especially for stand-alone 2G ethanol. For this investigation, integrated and separated 1G2G distillation simulations were conducted using Aspen Plus v.10 assuming a dilute 2G fermentation beer with titer varying from 5 to 40 g/L. The results were then assessed in heating energy demand savings for distillation, and it was measured the potential of saved bagasse (boiler fuel) for valorization in either electricity or 2G ethanol. A life cycle assessment was also performed for a consequential approach to carbon emission reductions from energy savings. As our main result, distillation integration can maintain the heat demand of a stand-alone 1G mill, regardless of the 2G ethanol beer titer. This means energy savings between 9 and 15% in total ethanol heat demand, and between 46 and 92% in 2G ethanol heat demand. The savings are due to the reflux ratio associated with 2G ethanol distillation becoming close to the host 1G distillation process. However, although the energy savings may result in economic gains, not assessed in this study, by using saved bagasse for either electricity (between 0.14 and 0.23 MJElectricity/kgEthanol) or 2G ethanol production (between 6.8 and 4.1 g2G Ethanol/kgEthanol), the boiler fuel savings do not significantly decrease carbon emissions of ethanol production (less than 1%). Nonetheless, the lower energy demand has the potential to debottleneck the operational cost challenge of distillation for 2G ethanol production without associated trade-offs.
Keywords
biorefinery, Distillation, Life Cycle Assessment, process integration, sugarcane ethanol
Suggested Citation
Costa LM, Athaley A, Losordo Z, Mariano AP, Posada J, Lynd LR. Synergies Between the Distillation of First- and Second-Generation Sugarcane Ethanol for Sustainable Biofuel Production. Systems and Control Transactions 4:534-539 (2025) https://doi.org/10.69997/sct.195037
Author Affiliations
Costa LM: Faculdade de Engenharia Química, Universidade Estadual de Campinas, Campinas, SP, Brazil; Department of Biotechnology, Delft University of Technology, Delft, the Netherlands
Athaley A: National Renewable Energy Laboratory, Golden, TX, USA
Losordo Z: Terragia Biofuel Incorporated, Hanover, NH, USA
Mariano AP: Faculdade de Engenharia Química, Universidade Estadual de Campinas, Campinas, SP, Brazil
Posada J: Department of Biotechnology, Delft University of Technology, Delft, the Netherlands; Postgraduate Department, Universidad ECCI, Bogotá, Colombia
Lynd LR: Terragia Biofuel Incorporated, Hanover, NH, USA; Thayer School of Engineering, Dartmouth College, Hanover, NH, USA
Journal Name
Systems and Control Transactions
Volume
4
First Page
534
Last Page
539
Year
2025
Publication Date
2025-07-01
Version Comments
Original Submission
Other Meta
PII: 0534-0539-1457-SCT-4-2025, Publication Type: Journal Article
Record Map
Published Article

LAPSE:2025.0237
This Record
External Link

https://doi.org/10.69997/sct.195037
Article DOI
Download
Files
Jun 27, 2025
Main Article
License
CC BY-SA 4.0
Meta
Record Statistics
Record Views
625
Version History
[v1] (Original Submission)
Jun 27, 2025
 
Verified by curator on
Jun 27, 2025
This Version Number
v1
Citations
Most Recent
This Version
URL Here
http://psecommunity.org/LAPSE:2025.0237
 
Record Owner
PSE Press
Links to Related Works
Directly Related to This Work
Article DOI
References Cited
  1. Smith P, House JI, Bustamante M, Sobocká J, Harper R, Pan G, West PC, Clark JM, Adhya T, Rumpel C, Paustian K, Kuikman P, Cotrufo MF, Elliott JA, McDowell R, Griffiths RI, Asakawa S, Bondeau A, Jain AK, Meersmans J, Pugh TAM. Global change pressures on soils from land use and management. Global Change Biology 22:1008-1028 (2015) https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.13068
  2. Ozcan Konur. Bioethanol Fuel Production Processes. II. CRC Press (2023) https://doi.org/10.1201/9781003226499
  3. Raízen. https://ri.raizen.com.br/en/e2g/
  4. Lynd LR, Beckham GT, Guss AM, Jayakody LN, Karp EM, Maranas CD, McCormick RL, Amador-Noguez D, Bomble YJ, Davison BH, Foster C, Himmel ME, Holwerda EK, Laser MS, Ng CY, Olson DG, Román-Leshkov Y, Trinh CT, Tuskan GA, Upadhayay V, Vardon DR, Wang L, Wyman CE. Toward low-cost biological and hybrid biological/catalytic conversion of cellulosic biomass to fuels. Energy Environ. Sci. 15:938-990 (2022) https://doi.org/10.1039/D1EE02540F
  5. National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL). Process design and economics for biochemical conversion of lignocellulosic biomass to ethanol: dilute-acid pretreatment and enzymatic hydrolysis of corn stover. Technical Report NREL/TP-5100/47764. (2011)
  6. Bonomi A, Cavalett O, Cunha MP, Lima MAP. Virtual Biorefinery. Springer (2016) https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-26045-7
  7. Bonhivers JC, Maciel MRW, Reddick C, Zemp R, Mariano AP, Filho RM. The E-S-T method based on the grande composite curve links energy consumption with number of stages and stage temperature for binary mixture distillation. Process Integr Optim Sustain 5:919-946 (2021) https://doi.org/10.1007/s41660-021-00189-0
  8. Bonhivers JC, Ortiza PAS, Reddick C, Rossel CEV, Mariano AP, Filho RM. Graphical analysis of plant-wide heat cascade for increasing energy efficiency in the production of ethanol and sugar from sugarcane. Process Integr Optim Sustain 5:335-359 (2021) https://doi.org/10.1007/s41660-020-00149-0
  9. International Organization for Standardization (ISO). ISO 14040: Environmental Management - Life Cycle Assessment - Principles and Framework. (2006)
  10. Capaz RS, Posada JA, Osseweijer P, Seabra JEA. The carbon footprint of alternative jet fuels produced in Brazil: exploring different approaches. Resources, Conservation & Recycling 166 (2021) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2020.105260
  11. Maga D, Thonemann N, Hiebel M, Sebastião D, Lopes TF, Fonseca C, Gírio F. Comparative life cycle assessment of first- and second-generation ethanol from sugarcane in Brazil. Int J Life Cycle Assess 24:266-280 (2019) https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-018-1505-1