LAPSE:2025.0199
Published Article

LAPSE:2025.0199
Comparative Analysis of Conventional and Novel Low-Temperature and Hybrid Technologies for Carbon Dioxide Removal from Natural Gas
June 27, 2025
Abstract
Natural gas production is expected to increase, leading to the exploitation of low-quality reserves that contain high levels of acid gases, such as carbon dioxide. The aim of this work is to compare various innovative and conventional technologies for the removal of CO2 from natural gas, considered as a binary mixture of methane and carbon dioxide, with CO2 contents ranging from 10 to 70 mol%. The processes are simulated using Aspen Plus® V9.0 and compared in terms of energy consumption, which is evaluated through the net equivalent methane method. The results show that novel low-temperature and hybrid technologies, which combine distillation and physical absorption, are the most energy-efficient for CO2 removal from natural gas with high acid gas contents, while conventional physical absorption processes are optimal for natural gas with low to moderate acid gas contents.
Natural gas production is expected to increase, leading to the exploitation of low-quality reserves that contain high levels of acid gases, such as carbon dioxide. The aim of this work is to compare various innovative and conventional technologies for the removal of CO2 from natural gas, considered as a binary mixture of methane and carbon dioxide, with CO2 contents ranging from 10 to 70 mol%. The processes are simulated using Aspen Plus® V9.0 and compared in terms of energy consumption, which is evaluated through the net equivalent methane method. The results show that novel low-temperature and hybrid technologies, which combine distillation and physical absorption, are the most energy-efficient for CO2 removal from natural gas with high acid gas contents, while conventional physical absorption processes are optimal for natural gas with low to moderate acid gas contents.
Record ID
Keywords
carbon dioxide removal, hybrid technologies, low-temperature distillation, Natural Gas, physical absorption
Subject
Suggested Citation
Restelli F, Guido GD. Comparative Analysis of Conventional and Novel Low-Temperature and Hybrid Technologies for Carbon Dioxide Removal from Natural Gas. Systems and Control Transactions 4:301-306 (2025) https://doi.org/10.69997/sct.156338
Author Affiliations
Restelli F: GASP - Group on Advanced Separation Processes & GAS Processing, Dipartimento di Chimica, Materiali e Ingegneria Chimica G. Natta, Politecnico di Milano, Piazza Leonardo da Vinci 32, 20133 Milano, Italy
Guido GD: GASP - Group on Advanced Separation Processes & GAS Processing, Dipartimento di Chimica, Materiali e Ingegneria Chimica G. Natta, Politecnico di Milano, Piazza Leonardo da Vinci 32, 20133 Milano, Italy
Guido GD: GASP - Group on Advanced Separation Processes & GAS Processing, Dipartimento di Chimica, Materiali e Ingegneria Chimica G. Natta, Politecnico di Milano, Piazza Leonardo da Vinci 32, 20133 Milano, Italy
Journal Name
Systems and Control Transactions
Volume
4
First Page
301
Last Page
306
Year
2025
Publication Date
2025-07-01
Version Comments
Original Submission
Other Meta
PII: 0301-0306-1582-SCT-4-2025, Publication Type: Journal Article
Record Map
Published Article

LAPSE:2025.0199
This Record
External Link

https://doi.org/10.69997/sct.156338
Article DOI
Download
Meta
Record Statistics
Record Views
494
Version History
[v1] (Original Submission)
Jun 27, 2025
Verified by curator on
Jun 27, 2025
This Version Number
v1
Citations
Most Recent
This Version
URL Here
http://psecommunity.org/LAPSE:2025.0199
Record Owner
PSE Press
Links to Related Works
References Cited
- Lange' S, Pellegrini LA, Vergani P, Lo Savio M. Energy and economic analysis of a new low-temperature distillation process for the upgrading of high-CO2 content natural gas streams. Ind Eng Chem Res 54(40):9770-9782 (2015) https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.iecr.5b02211
- De Guido G, Gilardi M, Pellegrini LA. Novel technologies for low-quality natural gas purification. In: Computer Aided Chemical Engineering (50:241-246), Elsevier (2021) https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-323-88506-5.50039-5
- Bucklin RW, Schendel RL. Comparison of Fluor Solvent and Selexol processes. Energy Progress 4(3):137-142 (1984)
- Xu J. CO2 capture from CO2-rich natural gas. US Patent 2015/0376527 A1. (2015)
- AspenTech. Aspen Plus® V9.0. (2016)
- De Guido G, Fogli MR, Pellegrini LA. Effect of heavy hydrocarbons on CO2 removal from natural gas by low-temperature distillation. Ind Eng Chem Res 57(21):7245-7256 (2018) https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.iecr.8b00614
- Mokhatab S, Poe W, Mak J. Handbook of Natural Gas Transmission and Processing. Principles and Practices. 4th edition. Gulf Professional Publishing (2018) https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-815817-3.00015-0
- Pellegrini LA, Langé S, Baccanelli M, De Guido G. Techno-economic analysis of LNG production using cryogenic vs conventional techniques for natural gas purification. Offshore Mediterranean Conference and Exhibition, Ravenna, Italy. (2015)
- Burr B, Lyddon L. A comparison of physical solvents for acid gas removal. Proceedings of the Gas Processors' Association Convention, Grapevine (TX), United States. (2008)
- Freireich E, Klooster HJ. Treatment of wet natural gas mixtures to recover liquid hydrocarbons. US Patent 3,770,622. (1973)

